摘要目的 比较留守与非留守妇女安全感及社会支持的差异.方法 采用安全感量表(SQ)和社会支持评定量表(SSRS)对留守妇女(n=98)和非留守妇女(n=151)的安全感和社会支持状况进行测量,用Spss17.0进行统计、分析.结果 ①在安全感量表中,与非留守妇女相比留守妇女在量表总分[(40.561±6.692)分 vs(59.722±8.699)分,t=18.530]、确定控制感因子[(21.459±3.891)分vs (30.013±4.950)分,t=14.450]、人际安全感因子[(19.102±3.737)分vs (29.709±4.849)分,t=18.392]等方面均低于非留守妇女得分,差异具有统计学意义(均P＜0.05).②在社会支持评定量表中,留守妇女在量表总分、对支持的利用度、主观支持、客观支持等方面均低于非留守妇女(均P＜0.05).③留守妇女安全感量表总分及各因子与社会支持评定量表总分及各因子存在显著正相关(r=0.245～0.507,P＜0.05).结论 留守妇女安全感及社会支持状况低于非留守妇女,有必要对其进行心理干预.

abstractsObjective To compare the difference of the sense of security and social support between left-behind women and non left-behind women in rural area.Methods Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS) and security questionnaire(SQ) were used to measure social support and sense of security of 98 left-behind women and 151 non left-behind women.The data was analyzed by SPSS17.0.Results ①In the social support rating,compared with the non left-behind women,the left-behind women has lower score in the total score((40.561±6.692) vs (59.722±8.699),t=18.530),determining the control factor((21.459±3.891) vs (30.013±4.950),t=14.450) and human security factor((19.102±3.737) vs (29.709±4.849),t=18.392) and the differences were statistical significant(all P＜0.05).②In the social support rating scale,left-behind women had lower scores in total score,exploitation degree of support,subjective support and objective support than the left-behind women(all P＜0.05).③The total score and each factor score of security scale,and the total score and each factor score of social support rating scale in the left-behind women showed significantly positively correlated(r=0.245-0.507,P＜0.05).Conclusion The sense of security and social support of the left behind women were worse than that of non left-behind women.It is necessary to carry out psychological intervention for them.