• 医学文献
  • 知识库
  • 评价分析
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

医学文献 >>
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批

窄带成像技术结合放大内镜在早期胃癌诊断中的应用价值

Effect of narrow-band imaging (NBI) combined with magnifying endoscopy in early diagnosis of gastric cancer

摘要:

目的 探讨窄带成像技术(NBI)联合放大内镜在胃癌早期诊断中的价值,观察其是否有助于经验欠缺内镜医生诊断.方法 选择2015年4月至2017年10月在本院就诊的经普通白光内镜(WLE)检查发现存在病变的480处病灶,以病理检测作为诊断的金标准,选取3名内镜阅片经验丰富的医生进行阅片.选取40名实习内镜医生,简单培训后,随机选取80处WLE图片和窄带成像技术联合放大内镜(ME-NBI)图片举办阅片会,采用实时投票判断病变性质.结果 ME-NBI诊断的准确率、灵敏度、特异度、假阳性率、假阴性率分别为97.9% (470/480),96.8% (120/124),98.3%(350/356),1.7%(6/356),3.2% (4/124);WLE诊断的准确率、灵敏度、特异度、假阳性率、假阴性率分别为91.7%(440/480),80.6%(100/124),89.9%(320/356),10.1%(36/356),19.4%(24/124),ME-NBI诊断准确率、灵敏度和特异度明显高于WLE(x2=18.989,16.104,15.859,P≤0.05),其假阳性率、假阴性率明显低于WLE(x2=22.772,16.104,P≤0.05).40名内镜实习医生的ME-NBI阅片诊断结果明显优于WLE(t=11.467,16.188,P≤0.05).结论 ME-NBI筛查早期胃癌,准确度度令人满意,且对于经验不足的医生也具有一定的诊断价值.

更多
abstracts:

Objective To explore the effect of nanow-band imaging (NBI) combined with magnifying endoscopy (ME) in early diagnosis of gastric cancer,and to observe whether it is helpful for inexperienced endoscopists to diagnose.Methods From April 2015 to October 2017,a total of 480 lesions were selected as research objects which were detected in the normal white light endoscopy (WLE).Pathological examination was used as the gold standard for diagnosis.3 experienced doctors were selected to read the endoscopy films.40 intern endoscopy doctors were selected to read the endoscopy filins at the same time after simple training.80 WLE images and narrowband imaging technology combined with magnifying endoscopy (ME-NBI) images were randomly selected to hold a film reading meeting.Real-time voting was used to judge the nature of lesions.Results The accuracy,sensitivity,specificity false positive rate and false negative rate of ME-NBI were 97.9% (470/480),96.8% (120/124),98.3% (350/356),1.7% (6/356),3.2%(4/124).And WLE values were 91.7% (440/480),80.6% (100/124),89.9% (320/356),10.1% (36/356),19.4% (24/124),respectively.The diagnostic accuracy,sensitivity and specificity of ME-NBI were significantly higher than those of WLE (x2 =18.989,16.104,15.859,P≤0.05),and the false positive rate and false negative rate were significantly lower than those of WLE (x2 =22.772,16.104,P ≤ 0.05).The diagnostic results of ME-NBI of 40 endoscopy interns were significantly better than those of WLE (t =11.467,16.188,P ≤0.05).The diagnostic results of NBI by 40 interns were significantly better than that of WLE (t =11.467,16.188,P ≤ 0.05).Conclusions The accuracy of ME-NBI in screening early gastric cancer is satisfactory,and it has certain diagnostic value for inexperienced doctors.

More
作者: 谢德金 [1] 王小忠 [1] 孙晓丹 [2] 郑楚发 [1]
期刊: 《中国医师杂志》2019年21卷1期 36-39页 ISTIC
栏目名称: 论著
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-1372.2019.01.010
发布时间: 2019-03-19
基金项目:
汕头市医疗科技计划项目(汕府科[2015]123号-10)Shantou Medical Science and Technology Program
  • 浏览:186
  • 下载:226

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

扩展文献

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷