• 医学文献
  • 知识库
  • 评价分析
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

医学文献 >>
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批

反加疗法在促性腺激素释放激素激动剂治疗内异症中减缓骨量流失的荟萃分析

A meta-analysis of preventing bone mineral loss in patients with endometriosis treated by gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues with add-back therapy

摘要:

目的 评价反加疗法在促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRH-a)治疗内异症中减缓骨量流失的作用及有效性.方法 检索Medline数据库、Embase数据库、Cochrane图书馆数据库、中国知网(CNKI)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、万方数据库,收集国内外应用GnRH-a及反加疗法治疗内异症开展的随机对照临床试验(RCT),对纳入的研究进行质量评价,提取数据,采用Stata 11.0软件对用药前后骨密度、生殖激素水平和疼痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分进行荟萃分析.结果 排除不符合纳入标准、随访期或失访人数不明确、重复发表、文献质量过低的研究后,最终共纳入13项RCT研究,调查对象累积785例[反加组(GnRH-a联合雌激素):377例,单药组(单独使用GnRH-a)408例].荟萃分析显示:(1)与单药组相比,反加组可减少骨量流失[标准化均数差(SMD)=0.223,95% CI:0.003 ~0.443,P=0.047];(2)反加组与单药组对血清雌激素水平的影响不显著(SMD=-0.053,95% CI:-0.479~0.373,P=0.807);(3)两组治疗后VAS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(SMD=-0.157,95% CI:-0.474~0.160,P=0.332).结论 应用GnRh-a联合雌激素的反加疗法对内异症患者疗效较好且可减缓骨量流失,优于单独应用GnRH-a.

更多
abstracts:

Objective To evaluate the role and efficacy of preventing bone mineral loss in patients with endometriosis treated by gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRH-a) combined with addback therapy.Methods Prospective,randomized controlled studies of the use of GnRHa with add-back therapy in treatment of endometriosis were enrolled in this study from Medline,Embase,Cochrane library,China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI),Chinese Biological Medicine Disk (CBM) and Data Base of Wanfang.After quality assessment and data extraction,meta-analysis were conducted in the change of BMD,reproductive hormone (E2) and visual pain score (VAS) by Stata 11.0 software.Results A total of 785patients from 13 randomized controlled trail (RCT) studies enrolled in this study after exclude no following up,poor quality and repeat published studies.377 patients were in group of GnRH-a with add-back treatment and 408 patients were in group of GnRna alone.The findinds were showed in meta-analysis:(1) there was a significant difference in percentage change of bone mineral density (BMD) between two groups,the addback therapy was more effective in prevention of bone loss which was (SMD =0.223,95% CI:0.003 to 0.443,P =0.047).(2) There was no significant difference in the level of reproductive hormone between two groups (SMD =-0.053,95% CI:-0.479 to 0.373,P =0.807).(3) There was also no significant difference in the visual pain score between the two groups (SMD =-0.157,95% CI:-0.474 to 0.160,P=0.332).Conclusions GnRH-a with add-back therapy have been shown to be more effective in preventing loss of BMD than GnRH-a treatment alone.However,the long term effect of preventing BMD should be studied.

More
  • 浏览:796
  • 下载:252

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

扩展文献

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷