• 医学文献
  • 知识库
  • 评价分析
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
高级检索

检索历史 清除

Safety and feasibility of transradial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction

摘要:

Background Transradial coronary intervention has been widely used because of its effects in lowering the incidence of complications in vascular access site and improving patient satisfaction compared to the femoral approach. This study aimed to investigate the safety and feasibility of transradial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).Methods A total of 103 consecutive elderly patients (age≥65 years) who were diagnosed as having AMI were indicated for PCI. Among them, 57 patients received primary PCI via the transradial approach (transradial intervention, TRI group),and 46 underwent primary PCI via the transfemoral approach (transfemoral intervention, TFI group). The success rate of puncture, puncture time, cannulation time, reperfusion time, the total time for PCI, the success rate of PCI, the use rates of temporary pacemaker and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), and the total length of hospital stay of the patients in the two groups were compared. After the procedure, vascular access site complications and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in the two groups in one month were observed.Results The success rates of puncture (98.2% vs 100.0%) and PCI (96.5% vs 95.7%) for the patients in the TRI and TFI groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). The puncture time ((2.4±1.1) vs (2.0±0.9) minutes), cannulation time ((2.7±0.5) vs (2.6±0.5) minutes), reperfusion time ((16.2±4.5) vs (15.4±3.6) minutes), total time of the procedure ((44.1±6.8) vs (41.2±5.7) minutes), use rates of temporary pacemaker (1.8% vs 2.2%) and IABP (0 vs 2.2%) in the two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05), but the hospital stay of the TFI group was longer than that of the TRI group ((10.1±4.6) VS (7.2±2.6) days, P<0.01). A radial occlusion was observed in the TRI group, but no ischemic syndrome in hand. In the TFI group, 4 patients had hematosis, 1 had pseudoaneurysm, and 1 had major bleeding.Statistical significance in vascular access site complications was seen in the two groups (1.8 % vs 13.1%, P<0.05). Three patients died in the two groups respectively in one month, and there was no statistical significance in MACE in the two groups (5.3% vs 6.5%, P>0.05).Conclusion The transradial approach for primary PCI is safe and feasible for elderly patients with AMI.

更多
作者单位: Department of Cardiology, Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China [1]
期刊: 《中华医学杂志(英文版)》2008年121卷9期 782-786页 SCISCIEMEDLINEISTICCSCDCABP
分类号: R5
栏目名称: ORIGINAL ARTICLES
发布时间: 2008-06-11
  • 浏览:88
  • 下载:16

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

扩展文献

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

北京万方数据股份有限公司

万方数据电子出版社

京ICP证010071号

京公网安备11010802020237号

京ICP备08100800号-1

违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

充值 订阅 收藏 移动端 使用
帮助