• 医学文献
  • 知识库
  • 评价分析
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

医学文献 >>
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批

城市社区卫生技术人员对全科医生团队建设与管理现状评价

Interdisciplinary family doctor team building and its management in urban community health service: perspectives from primary health workers

摘要:

目的 从社区卫生技术人员的视角评价我围全科医生团队建设与管理现状.方法 2016年3月1-31日,对12个省24家中国社区卫生协会培训基地全体卫生技术人员765人进行问卷调查,分析社区卫生技术人员对全科医生团队的认识情况、团队建设和管理现状评价,比较不同地区、不同岗位社区卫生技术人员对全科医生团队建设和管理的满意度.结果 共发出调查问卷765份,收到有效调查问卷738份,问卷有效率96.5%.70.73% (522/738)的社区卫生技术人员对全科医生团队的工作表示支持,对全科医生团队建设与管理的总体满意度为48.61%(2 870/5 904),其中,对“团队绩效考核与激励工作”“团队被赋予的自主权”“团队成员职责分工合理性”和“团队成员配置合理性”的满意度较低,分别为32.25%(238/738)、40.92% (302/738)、44.44%(328/738)、48.78% (360/738).不同地区、不同岗位社区卫生技术人员对全科医生团队服务的总体满意度差异均有统计学意义(x(2分别为176.86,57.17,均P<0.05).其中,西部地区和公共卫生岗位社区卫生技术人员对全科医生团队服务的满意度低,分别为35.65%(636/1 784)和43.91% (534/1 216).结论 目前我国社区卫生技术人员支持全科医生团队,但全科医生团队组成及职责分工尚不完善,团队激励和竞争机制有待强化.西部地区和公共卫生岗位的社区卫生技术人员对全科医生团队建设和管理满意度相对较低,应该重点予以关注.

更多
abstracts:

Objective To survey the perspectives from primary health workers on the building and management of interdisciplinary family doctor team in urban community health service.Methods Primary health workers from 24 community health centers of 14 provinces were selected to participate in a questionnaire survey on March 2016.The attitude and satisfaction of participants with interdisciplinary family doctor team in urban community health setting were surveyed and analyzed.Results There were 765 questionnaires were distributed and 738 valid ones were returned with a retrieve rate of 96.5%.The survey showed that 70.73 % (522/738) of participants supported the interdisciplinary family doctor teamwork,while the overall satisfaction with items regarding its building and management was 48.61% (2 870/5 904).Participants were mostly dissatisfied with performance appraisal and incentive mechanism (32.25%),autonomy of team (40.92%),job division of team members (44.44%) and rationality of professional allocation in the team (48.78%).There were significant differences in overall satisfaction rate among primary health workers in different positions and from different regions (x2 =176.86 and 57.17,both P < 0.05).The overall satisfaction of participants in western regions was only 35.65 % (636/1 784) and that of public health workers was 43.91% (534/1 216).Conclusion Currently,the building and management of interdisciplinary family doctor team in urban community health service are in a initial stage,although its importance has been recognized.Team composition,responsibility of various team members and effective incentive mechanism should be further improved,and more attention should be paid to western regions and for public health workers.

More
作者: 尹德卢 [1] 殷涛 [1] 辛倩倩 [1] 王利红 [1]
栏目名称: 论著
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7368.2017.10.010
发布时间: 2017-11-24
基金项目:
国家自然科学基金项目(71303164)National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • 浏览:137
  • 下载:60

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

扩展文献

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷