医学文献 >>
  • 检索发现
  • 增强检索
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
默认
×
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

床旁超声心动图在Stanford A型主动脉夹层诊断和院内死亡风险评估中的价值

Value of bedside echocardiography in diagnosis and risk assessment of in-hospital death for patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection

摘要目的 探讨床旁超声心动图在Stanford A型主动脉夹层诊断和院内死亡风险评估中的价值.方法 回顾性分析2009年1月至2016年1月在复旦大学附属中山医院经CT血管成像确诊的229例Stanford A型主动脉夹层患者的临床资料.根据是否发生院内死亡,将患者分为存活组(191例)和死亡组(38例).分析Stanford A型主动脉夹层患者的床旁超声心动图表现,并采用多因素logistic回归分析患者发生院内死亡的影响因素.结果 (1)死亡组接受手术治疗的比率小于存活组[60.52%(23/38)比85.34%(163/191),P<0.01];存活组与死亡组的年龄、性别、Debakey分型、合并高血压病史和马凡综合征比率差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05).(2)床旁超声心动图显示,死亡组主动脉瓣受累和主动脉瓣重度反流比率均高于存活组[分别为65.79%(25/38)比34.03%(65/191)和44.74%(17/38)比14.14%(27/191),P均<0.01];死亡组的主动脉根部直径大于存活组[(55.5 ±6.4)mm比(42.3±7.8)mm,P<0.01];心包积液、主动脉窦部扩张比率和左心室射血分数差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05).(3)多因素logistic回归分析显示,主动脉瓣受累(OR=3.275,95%CI 1.290 ~ 8.313,P<0.05)、主动脉根部直径(OR=1.202,95%CI 1.134 ~1.275,P<0.01)和接受手术(OR=0.224,95% CI0.079 ~0.629,P<0.01)是Stanford A型主动脉夹层患者院内死亡的独立影响因素.结论 床旁超声心动图对Stanford A型主动脉夹层有重要诊断价值;主动脉瓣受累、主动脉根部直径增大和未接受手术是Stanford A型主动脉夹层患者院内死亡的危险因素.

更多

abstractsObjective To investigate the value of bedside echocardiography in diagnosis and risk assessment of in-hospital death of patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection.Methods The clinical data of 229 patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection diagnosed by CT angiography in Zhongshan Hospital affiliated to Fudan University between January 2009 and January 2016 were retrospectively analyzed.The patients were divided into survival group (191 cases)and non-survival group (38 cases) according to presence or absence of in-hospital death.The bedside echocardiography features were analyzed,and influence factors of in-hospital death were determined by multivariate logistic regression analysis.Results (1) Compared with the survival group,the non-survival group had lower surgery rate (60.52% (23/38) vs.85.34% (163/191),P <0.01).Age,gender and Debakey classification were similar between survival group and death group (all P > 0.05).(2) The bedside echocardiography results showed that prevalence of aortic valve involvement (65.79% (25/38) vs.34.03% (65/191),P < 0.01) and severe aortic regurgitation (44.74% (17/38) vs.14.14% (27/191),P < 0.01) were significantly higher in non-survival group than in survival group.The non-survival group had larger aortic root diameter than the survival group ((55.5 ± 6.4)mm vs.(42.3 ± 7.8)mm,P < 0.01).There were no significant differences in pericardial effusion,expansion of aortic sinus,and left ventricular ejection fraction between survival group and non-survival group (all P > 0.05).(3) The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that aortic valve involvement(OR =3.275,95% CI 1.290-8.313,P < 0.05),aortic root diameter (OR =1.202,95% CI 1.134-1.275,P < 0.01),and surgery (OR =0.224,95% CI 0.079-0.629,P < 0.01) were independent risk factors for in-hospital death in patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection.Conclusions Bedside echocardiography has significant diagnostic value for Stanford type A aortic dissection.Aortic valve involvement,enlargement of aortic root diameter and without surgery are independent risk factors for patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection.

More
广告
栏目名称
DOI 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.11.011
发布时间 2017-12-22(万方平台首次上网日期,不代表论文的发表时间)
基金项目
Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology ((114119a9000)上海市科学技术委员会资助项目(114119a9000))
  • 浏览0
  • 下载0
中华心血管病杂志

中华心血管病杂志

2017年45卷11期

954-957页

MEDLINEISTICPKUCSCDCA

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

扩展文献

法律状态公告日 法律状态 法律状态信息

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new医文AI 翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷