• 医学文献
  • 知识库
  • 评价分析
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

医学文献 >>
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批

应用改良Delphi法制定神经根型颈椎病治疗专家共识

Cervical radiculopathy treatment experts' consensus to establish radiculopathy type by using the modified Delphi meth-od

摘要:

目的:应用改良Delphi法制定神经根型颈椎病治疗专家共识。方法应用文献检索法检索国内外关于神经根型颈椎病治疗的相关文献,并参考我国现有的神经根型颈椎病诊疗资料及规范,初步拟定包含八个方面(非手术治疗有效比、颈部制动、理疗、药物治疗、手术适应证、手术禁忌证、颈前路手术减压、颈前路手术内固定植入)23个问题的神经根型颈椎病治疗草案。在全国多个地区选取有专业代表性的专家组成专家组,应用改良Delphi法收集专家反馈意见,并对草案中的内容进行筛选及修改。共组织三次专家评估,专家赞同百分比设为≥70%。结果共30位专家组成专家组,三次专家评估的问卷回收数量分别为30份(100%)、24份(80.0%)、16份(53.3%);三次专家评估完成后,专家赞同百分率≥70%的问题共计18个,占所有问题的64.3%(18/28)。专家在七个方面达成共识,包括非手术治疗有效比(1个)、颈部制动(1个)、理疗(1个)、药物治疗(5个)、手术适应证(3个)、手术禁忌证(4个)、手术方式(3个)。结论在目前神经根型颈椎病部分治疗方案仍缺乏循证医学支持的情况下,应用改良Delphi法制定的专家共识代表性强、意见趋同性好,在研究过程中部分未达成共识的治疗方案为今后研究指明了方向。

更多
abstracts:

Objective Cervical radiculopathy treatment experts' consensus to establish radiculopathy type by using the modified Delphi method. Methods Use document retrieval method to review information and articles about the treatment guidelines and articles of cervical radiculopathy including domestic and international areas, established a protocol about clini?cal consensus of the treatments for cervical radiculopathy. This protocol included 23 questions (the effective proportion of non?operating therapy, neck immobilization, physiotherapy, pharmacologic treatment, surgical indications, contraindications, anteri?or surgical decompression, anterior surgical implants). We performed a modified Delphi survey in which current professional opinions from experienced experts, representing from almost all of the Chinese provinces, were gathered. And then we modi?fied the protocol according to those professional opinions. Three rounds were performed and finally we established consensus. Consensus was achieved with ≥70% agreement. Results The panel included 30 experienced experts. The recycling question?naire's quantity of three rounds were 30(100%), 24(80%) and 16(53.3%) respectively. After three expert assessments, there were 18 questions which achieved with≥70%agreement and these questions accounted for 64.3%(18/28) of all the questions. Consen?sus of the treatments for cervical radiculopathy was reached on 7 aspects, including:the effective proportion of non?operating thera?py (1 question), neck immobilization (1 question), physiotherapy (1 question), pharmacologic treatment (5 questions), surgical indi?cations (3 questions), contraindications (4 questions), surgery (3 questions). Conclusion This modified Delphi study had reached a consensus concerning several treatment issues on cervical radiculopathy which had strong representativeness of experts and good convergence of opinions. In the absence of high?level evidence, at present, these experts' opinion findings will guide health care providers to define appropriate treatment in their regions. Areas with no consensus provide excellent insight for future research.

More
作者: 藏磊 [1] 海涌 [1] 范宁 [1] 鲁世保 [1] 杨晋才 [1] 苏庆军 [1] 杜鹏 [1] 高艳军 [1]
期刊: 《中华骨科杂志》2015年9期 890-897页 ISTICPKUCSCD
栏目名称: 临床论著
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2015.09.002
发布时间: 2015-09-21
基金项目:
北京市科技重大项目
  • 浏览:222
  • 下载:1226

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

扩展文献

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷