不同方法腹腔镜下胆囊切除术对患者预后及生活质量的影响
The clinical efficacy and the influence of different operative methods in patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy on quality of life
摘要目的 比较单孔法、三孔法及四孔法腹腔镜下胆囊切除术对患者预后及生活质量的影响.方法 以行腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者60例为研究对象,分别采用单孔法、三孔法及四孔法腹腔镜下胆囊切除术,比较不同方法腹腔镜下胆囊切除术术中一般情况、患者术后恢复情况及并发症发生情况,并对消化系统疾病生活质量指数进行比较分析.结果 单孔组手术时间较三孔组、四孔组明显延长(t =3.82、4.04,均P<0.05),但术中出血量、住院时间、住院费用均明显低于三孔组、四孔组(均P<0.05);单孔组、三孔组、四孔组并发症发生率分别为50.0%、32.0%、44.0%,三组间并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).出院时,三孔组、四孔组消化系统疾病生活质量指数(CIQLI)各维度评分较入院时差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05),单孔组生理功能、社会活动、精神心理及CIQLI总分均较入院时明显提高(t=2.22、1.87、2.31、2.43,均P<0.05),与三孔组、四孔组差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05).结论 单孔腹腔镜下胆囊切除术较三孔、四孔法可显著减少患者术中出血量、缩短住院治疗时间、减少住院费用,并有效改善患者术后生活质量.
更多相关知识
abstractsObjective To explore the clinical efficacy and the influence of one-port,three-port and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy on quality of life in patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Methods The clinical data of 60 patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy were reviewed,and to compare the general condition,the influence of postoperative recovery and complications,disease of digestive system and the quality of life index in patients treated by one-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy(one-port group),three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy(three-port group) and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy(four-port group).Results Although the time of operation in oneport group was longer than the other two groups (t =3.82,P < 0.05 ; t =4.04,P < 0.05),there were significant differ ences in the volume of the inoperative blood loss,hospital stay time,hospital costs in one-port group compared with the other two groups (P < 0.05).There was no difference among the three groups in the incidence of postoperative complications (P > 0.05).And when leaving hospital,the score of all dimensionalitis in the scale of Gastrointestinal quality of life index (CIQLI),containing the state of physiological function,state of daily life and social activities,psychological emotional state and quality of life of the total score were all higher than those in the other two groups (t =2.22,1.87,2.31,2.43,all P < 0.05),and there was no difference between three-port group and four-port group(P > 0.05).Conclusion Compared with the three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy,one-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy can reduce the inoperative blood loss,shorten hospitalization time and reduce their fee in hospital,and it also can effectively improve patients'quality of life,restore the patients'normal work and life in the shortest possible time.
More相关知识
- 浏览235
- 被引5
- 下载24

相似文献
- 中文期刊
- 外文期刊
- 学位论文
- 会议论文


换一批



