摘要目的：比较胸腔镜辅助小切口和传统开胸手术对非小细胞肺癌治疗的远期疗效差异。方法回顾性分析80例非小细胞肺癌患者临床资料，对比不同术式治疗患者的总生存期和无进展生存期的差异。结果胸腔镜辅助小切口组和传统开胸手术组患者术后总生存期差异无统计学意义（P=0.264），无进展生存期差异无统计学意义（P=0.138）。结论胸腔镜辅助小切口和传统开胸手术对非小细胞肺癌治疗的远期疗效无明显差异，且胸腔镜辅助小切口手术具有手术创伤小、患者术后恢复快等优点，是分期较早肺癌患者的理想术式。

abstractsObjectiveTo evaluate the difference of long-term effect of video-assisted minithoracotomy(VAMT) and conventional thoracotomy for non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC). MethodsRetrospective analysis of 80 cases of NSCLC, their differences in overall survival (OS) and progression free time (PFS) were compared.ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference in OS of patients in two groups (P=0.264). There was also no statistically significant difference in PFS of patients in two groups(P=0.138).ConclusionThere was no significant difference in long-term effect of VAMT and conventional thoracotomy for NSCLC.VAMT had less injury and recovered soon after operationsis,It's a reasonable and effective operation choice for early NSCLC.