医学文献 >>
  • 检索发现
  • 增强检索
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
默认
×
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

Comparison of unipedicular and bipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures:a meta-analysis

摘要Background Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PKP) has proved its effectiveness regarding minimal invasion,rapid pain reduction,safe cement augmentation,restoring vertebral height,and accelerating complete recovery of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).Whether unipedicular or bipedicular PKP provides a better outcome is controversial.Methods We searched PubMed,Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials,Web of Knowledge,Chinese Biomedical Literature Database,and Wanfang Data from January 1980 to March 2013 with "kyphoplasty","unipedicular","bipedicular","compression fracture",and "randomized controlled trial".Risk of bias in the included studies was assessed according to a 12-item scale.Meta-analysis was performed.Dichotomous and continuous variables were calculated using the odds ratio (OR) and standardized mean difference (SMD),respectively.Results Seven studies involving 440 patients and 559 vertebral bodies met the criteria for inclusion.Among them,one randomized controlled trial had a high risk of bias and six a low risk.The pain visual analogue scale (VAS) SMDs were -0.02 (P=0.88) for short-term follow-up (≤3 months) and 0.03 (P=0.82) for long-term follow-up (≥ 1 year).Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) SMDs at short-and long-term follow-up were not statistically significant (-0.04,P=0.77 and-0.07,P=0.74,respectively).This meta-analysis showed greater polymethylmethacrylate volume (SMD-1.08,P=0.00) and operation time (SMD-2.40,P=0.00),favoring unipedicular PKP.Radiographic outcomes-preoperative kyphosis angle,restoration rate,reduction angle,loss of reduction angle-were not statistically different between the groups.Pooled analyses of cement leakage and subsequent adjacent OVCFs showed no significant differences between the groups,with OR=0.82 (P=0.79) and OR=1.41 (P=0.70),respectively.Conclusions This meta-analysis comparing unipedicular and bipedicular PKP demonstrated no significant differences regarding VAS,ODI,radiographic outcomes,or complications.Considering the longer operation time and radiation exposure with bipedicular PKP,we recommend unipedicular PKP over bipedicular PKP for treating OVCFs.

更多
广告
作者单位 People's Liberation Army Institute of Orthopedics, Beijing Army General Hospital, Beijing 100700, China [1]
栏目名称
DOI 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20131398
发布时间 2013-11-25(万方平台首次上网日期,不代表论文的发表时间)
提交
  • 浏览119
  • 下载21
中华医学杂志(英文版)

中华医学杂志(英文版)

2013年126卷20期

3956-3961页

SCIMEDLINEISTICCSCDCABP

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new医文AI 翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷