• 医学文献
  • 知识库
  • 评价分析
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

医学文献>>
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批

Comparison of two different renorrhaphy techniques in retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for complex tumor

摘要Background Partial nephrectomy is currently the standard treatment for clinical T1 renal neoplasms,as it can provide oncologic outcomes equivalent to radical nephrectomy.The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of self-retaining suture (SRS)in renorrhaphy technique in retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for a single renal mass of moderate or high complexity by assessing peri-operative outcomes.Methods A retrospective analysis was done of 64 patients between 2010 and 2012 for complex renal mass (RENAL score >7) in whom retroperitoneal LPN was performed with two layers using continuous knotless barbed suture (Quill PDO SRS group; n=34) and absorbable vicryl (non-SRS group; n=30),respectively.Cases were matched for RENAL score.All the surgical procedures were performed by the same surgeon with experience of more than 500 cases of LPN.Comparisons were made in patients and preoperative outcomes and peri-operative complications between SRS group and non-SRS group.Results Mean warm ischemia time (WIT) in SRS group was less than non-SRS group (18.0 vs.24.8 minutes,P=0.021).Renorrhaphy suture cost in SRS group was lower than non-SRS group ($269.6 vs.$335.8,P=0.001).There were no significant differences between the two groups for postoperative changes in creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate and the rate of peri-operative complications.Conclusion SRS was safe for complex renal tumor with two layers,continuous and unknot suture,during LPN and would reduce the WIT and renorrhaphy suture cost significantly.

更多
广告
作者单位 Department of Urology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China;Department of Urology, Taiyuan City Center Hospital, Taiyuan,Shanxi 030009, China [1] Department of Urology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China [2]
栏目名称 ORIGINAL ARTICLES
DOI 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20131761
发布时间 2014-01-18
提交
  • 浏览149
  • 下载48
中华医学杂志(英文版)

中华医学杂志(英文版)

2013年126卷24期

4629-4632页

SCIMEDLINEISTICCSCDCABP

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷