• 医学文献
  • 知识库
  • 评价分析
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

医学文献>>
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批

Intravitreal bevacizumab with or without triamcinolone acetonide for diabetic macular edema: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

摘要Background Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs and corticosteroids are being widely used to treat diabetic macular edema (DME).The purpose of this study was to evaluate further the efficacy and safety of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) alone in comparison with intravitreal bevacizumab combined with triamcinolone acetonide (IVB/IVr) in the treatment of DME.Methods Pertinent publications were identified through CNKI,PubMed,Medline,EMBASE,and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register up to November 30,2013.Two investigators independently assessed the quality of the trials,and changes in central macular thickness (CMT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were extracted at 6 weeks and 3,6,12,and 24 months after the initial treatment.A meta-analysis was carried out to compare the results between the groups receiving IVB and IVB/IVT using the software RevMan 5.0.Results A total of six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified and included.The meta-analysis revealed that a significant reduction of the CMT was observed at 3 months after the initial treatment in the IVB/IVT group compared to the IVB group (P=0.001).Also,changes in CMT at 6 weeks and 6,12,and 24 months did not vary significantly between the IVB and IVB/IVT groups (P=0.53,0.76,0.34,and 0.09,respectively).Similarly,changes in BCVA at 6 weeks and 3,6,12,and 24 months also did not vary significantly between the two groups (P=0.66,0.98,0.81,0.07,and 0.80,respectively).The results were robust to sensitivity analyses.However,the rate of intraocular pressure (lOP) rise after intravitreal injections varied significantly between the IVB and IVB/IVT groups (P <0.01).A publication bias was not detected by funnel plots,the Egger method,or the Begg method.Conclusions Results of this meta-analysis showed that the treatments with IVB alone and combined IVB/IVT were similarly effective in improving the visual acuity,and,to some degree; combined IVB/IVr appeared to offer a marginal advantage over IVB in decreasing CMT in patients with DME.However,the addition of IVT resulted in intraocular pressure rise in some treated patients.

更多
广告
作者单位 Department of Ophthalmology, Jinshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 201508, China [1]
栏目名称 META ANALYSIS
DOI 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20140080
发布时间 2014-10-28
提交
  • 浏览78
  • 下载4
中华医学杂志(英文版)

中华医学杂志(英文版)

2014年127卷19期

3471-3476页

SCIMEDLINEISTICCSCDCABP

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷