• 医学文献
  • 知识库
  • 评价分析
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

医学文献>>
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批

Palliative Therapy for Gastric Outlet Obstruction Caused by Unresectable Gastric Cancer: A Meta-analysis Comparison of Gastrojejunostomy with Endoscopic Stenting

摘要Background:Gastrojejunostomy (GJJ) and endoscopic stenting (ES) are palliative treatments for gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) caused by gastric cancer.We compared the outcomes of GJJ with ES by performing a meta-analysis.Methods:Clinical trials that compared GJJ with ES for the treatment of GOO in gastric cancer were included in the meta-analysis.Procedure time,time to resumption of oral intake,duration of hospital stay,patency duration,and overall survival days were compared using weighted mean differences (WMDs).Technical success,clinical success,procedure-related mortality,complications,the rate of re-obstruction,postoperative chemotherapy,and reintervention were compared using odds ratios (ORs).Results:Nine studies were included in the analysis.Technical success and clinical success were not significantly different between the ES and GJJ groups.The ES group had a shorter procedure time (WMD =-80.89 min,95% confidence interval [CI] =-93.99 to-67.78,P < 0.001),faster resumption of oral intake (WMD =-3.45 days,95% CI=-5.25 to-1.65,P < 0.001),and shorter duration of hospital stay (WMD =-7.67 days,95% CI =-11.02 to-4.33,P < 0.001).The rate of minor complications was significantly higher in the GJJ group (OR =0.13,95% CI =0.04-0.40,P < 0.001).However,the rates of major complications (OR =6.91,95% CI =3.90-12.25,P < 0.001),re-obstruction (OR =7.75,95% CI =4.06-14.78,P < 0.001),and reintervention (OR =6.27,95% CI =3.36-11.68,P < 0.001) were significantly lower in the GJJ group than that in the ES group.Moreover,GJJ was significantly associated with a longer patency duration (WMD =-167.16 days,95% CI =-254.01 to-89.31,P < 0.001) and overall survival (WMD =-103.20 days,95% CI =-161.49to-44.91,P=0.001).Conclusions:Both GJJ and ES are effective procedures for the treatment of GOO caused by gastric cancer.ES is associated with better short-term outcomes.GJJ is preferable to ES in terms of its lower rate of stent-related complications,re-obstruction,and reintervention.GJJ should be considered a treatment option for patients with a long life expectancy and good performance status.

更多
广告
作者单位 Department of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China [1]
栏目名称 Meta Analysis
DOI 10.4103/0366-6999.180530
发布时间 2016-06-07
提交
  • 浏览18
  • 下载20
中华医学杂志(英文版)

中华医学杂志(英文版)

2016年129卷9期

1113-1121页

SCIMEDLINEISTICCSCDCABP

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷