• 医学文献
  • 知识库
  • 评价分析
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

医学文献>>
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety between First and Second Generation Drug-eluting Stents in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Single-center Retrospective Study

摘要Background:Lots of trials demonstrate that second-generation drug-eluting stents (G2-DES),with their improved properties,offer significantly superior efficacy and safety profiles compared to first generation DES (Gl-DES) for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).This study aimed to verify the advantage of G2-DES over G1-DES in Chinese patients with stable CAD (SCAD).Methods:For this retrospective observational analysis,2709 SCAD patients with either G1-DES (n =863) or G2-DES (n =1846) were enrolled consecutively throughout 2013.Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to control differing baseline factors.Two-year outcomes,including major adverse coronary events as well as individual events,including target vessel-related myocardial infarction,target lesion revascularization (TLR),target vessel revascularization,and cardiogenic death were evaluated.Results:The incidence of revascularization between G1-and G2-DES showed a trend of significant difference with a threshold P-value (8.6% vs.6.7%,x2 =2.995,P =0.084).G2-DES significantly improved TLR-free survival compared to G1-DES (96.6% vs.97.9%,P =0.049) and revascularization-free survival curve showed a trend of improvement of G2-DES (92.0% vs.93.8%,P =0.082).These difterences diminished after PSM.Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis showed a trend for G 1-associated increase in revascularization (hazard ratio:1.28,95% confidence interval:0.95-1.72,P =0.099) while no significance was found after PSM.Other endpoints showed no significant differences after multivariate adjustment regardless of PSM.Conclusions:G1-DES showed the same safety as G2-DES in this large Chinese cohort of real-world patients.However,G2-DES improved TLR-ffee survival of SCAD patients 2 years after PCI.The advantage was influenced by baseline clinical factors.GI-DES was associated with a trend of increase in revascularization risk and was not an independent predictor of worse medium-term prognosis compared with G2-DES.

更多
广告
作者单位 Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China [1] Department of Physiology, Colleges of Pharmacy and Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA [2]
栏目名称 Original Articles
DOI 10.4103/0366-6999.209904
发布时间 2017-08-24
基金项目
This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China the National Key Research and Development Program of China during the 13th Five-Year Plan Period
提交
  • 浏览12
  • 下载4
中华医学杂志(英文版)

中华医学杂志(英文版)

2017年130卷14期

1654-1661页

SCIMEDLINEISTICCSCDCABP

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷