• 医学文献
  • 知识库
  • 评价分析
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

医学文献>>
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批

Comparison of Proximal Femoral Geometry and Risk Factors between Femoral Neck Fractures and Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures in an Elderly Chinese Population

摘要Background:Few studies have investigated the differences in proximal femoral geometry and risk factors between patients with different types of hip fracture,especially in elderly Chinese.This study aimed to assess the differences in proximal femoral geometry parameters between patients with femoral neck fractures and patients with intertrochanteric fractures to provide guidance for individualized customized prosthesis and accurate reconstruction of proximal femurs in elderly Chinese patients.Methods:We retrospectively studied the electronic medical records of 198 elderly patients over 65 years of age who were admitted to the orthopedic department with hip fractures between January 2017 and December 2017 in The Third Hospital,Hebei Medical University.Age,fracture site,gender,and proximal femoral geometry parameters (neck shaft angle [NSA],center edge angle [CEA],femoral head diameter [FHD],femoral neck diameter [FND],femoral neck axial length [FNAL],hip axial length [HAL],and femoral shaft diameter [FSD]) were recorded.Student's t-test was used to compare the continuous variables,Chi-square test was used to analyze categorical variables,and multiple logistic stepwise regression analysis was used to evaluate the influencing factors of hip fracture type.Results:Statistically significant differences in NSA (137.63 ± 4.56° vs.132.07 ± 4.17°,t =1.598,P < 0.001),CEA (37.62 ± 6.77° vs.43.11 ± 7.09°,t =5.597,P < 0.001),FND (35.21 ± 3.25 mm vs.34.09 ± 3.82 mm,t =2.233,P =0.027),and FNAL (99.30 ± 7.91 mm vs.103.58 ± 8.39 mm,t =3.715,P < 0.001) were found between the femoral neck fracture group and femoral intertrochanteric fracture group.FHD,FND,FSD,HAL,and FNAL were different between sexes (all P < 0.001).The greater NSA was the risk factor for femoral neck fractures (odds ratio [OR]:0.70,P < 0.001),greater CEA and longer FNAL were risk factors for femoral intertrochanteric fractures (OR:1.15,1.17,all P < 0.001),and greater FND was a protective factor for femoral intertrochanteric fractures (OR:0.74,P < 0.001).Conclusions:We demonstrate differences in geometric morphological parameters of the proximal femur in different hip fracture types,as well as an effect of sex.These differences should be considered in the selection of prostheses for fracture internal fixation and hip replacements.These data could help guide the design of individualized customized prostheses and improve the accurate reconstruction of the proximal femur for elderly Chinese hip fracture patients.

更多
广告
作者单位 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Third Hospital, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050051, China;Key Laboratory of Biomechanics of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050051, China [1] Department of Nosocomial Infection, Anqing Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Anqing, Anhui 246003, China [2] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Third Hospital, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050051, China;Key Laboratory of Biomechanics of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050051, China;Chinese Academy of Engineering, Beijing 100088, China [3]
栏目名称 Original Articles
DOI 10.4103/0366-6999.244118
发布时间 2018-12-07
提交
  • 浏览19
  • 下载12
中华医学杂志(英文版)

中华医学杂志(英文版)

2018年131卷21期

2524-2530页

SCIMEDLINEISTICCSCDCABP

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷