• 医学文献
  • 知识库
  • 评价分析
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

医学文献>>
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批

Individualized red-cell transfusion strategy for non-cardiac surgery in adults: a randomized controlled trial

Individualized red-cell transfusion strategy for non-cardiac surgery in adults: a randomized controlled trial

摘要Background::Red-cell transfusion is critical for surgery during the peri-operative period; however, the transfusion threshold remains controversial mainly owing to the diversity among patients. The patient’s medical status should be evaluated before making a transfusion decision. Herein, we developed an individualized transfusion strategy using the West-China-Liu’s Score based on the physiology of oxygen delivery/consumption balance and designed an open-label, multicenter, randomized clinical trial to verify whether it reduced red cell requirement as compared with that associated with restrictive and liberal strategies safely and effectively, providing valid evidence for peri-operative transfusion.Methods::Patients aged >14 years undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery with estimated blood loss > 1000 mL or 20% blood volume and hemoglobin concentration <10 g/dL were randomly assigned to an individualized strategy, a restrictive strategy following China’s guideline or a liberal strategy with a transfusion threshold of hemoglobin concentration <9.5 g/dL. We evaluated two primary outcomes: the proportion of patients who received red blood cells (superiority test) and a composite of in-hospital complications and all-cause mortality by day 30 (non-inferiority test).Results::We enrolled 1182 patients: 379, 419, and 384 received individualized, restrictive, and liberal strategies, respectively. Approximately 30.6% (116/379) of patients in the individualized strategy received a red-cell transfusion, less than 62.5% (262/419) in the restrictive strategy (absolute risk difference, 31.92%; 97.5% confidence interval [CI]: 24.42-39.42%; odds ratio, 3.78%; 97.5% CI: 2.70-5.30%; P<0.001), and 89.8% (345/384) in the liberal strategy (absolute risk difference, 59.24%; 97.5% CI: 52.91-65.57%; odds ratio, 20.06; 97.5% CI: 12.74-31.57; P<0.001). No statistically significant differences were found in the composite of in-hospital complications and mortality by day 30 among the three strategies. Conclusion::The individualized red-cell transfusion strategy using the West-China-Liu’s Score reduced red-cell transfusion without increasing in-hospital complications and mortality by day 30 when compared with restrictive and liberal strategies in elective non-cardiac surgeries.Trial registration::ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01597232.

更多

abstractsBackground::Red-cell transfusion is critical for surgery during the peri-operative period; however, the transfusion threshold remains controversial mainly owing to the diversity among patients. The patient’s medical status should be evaluated before making a transfusion decision. Herein, we developed an individualized transfusion strategy using the West-China-Liu’s Score based on the physiology of oxygen delivery/consumption balance and designed an open-label, multicenter, randomized clinical trial to verify whether it reduced red cell requirement as compared with that associated with restrictive and liberal strategies safely and effectively, providing valid evidence for peri-operative transfusion.Methods::Patients aged >14 years undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery with estimated blood loss > 1000 mL or 20% blood volume and hemoglobin concentration <10 g/dL were randomly assigned to an individualized strategy, a restrictive strategy following China’s guideline or a liberal strategy with a transfusion threshold of hemoglobin concentration <9.5 g/dL. We evaluated two primary outcomes: the proportion of patients who received red blood cells (superiority test) and a composite of in-hospital complications and all-cause mortality by day 30 (non-inferiority test).Results::We enrolled 1182 patients: 379, 419, and 384 received individualized, restrictive, and liberal strategies, respectively. Approximately 30.6% (116/379) of patients in the individualized strategy received a red-cell transfusion, less than 62.5% (262/419) in the restrictive strategy (absolute risk difference, 31.92%; 97.5% confidence interval [CI]: 24.42-39.42%; odds ratio, 3.78%; 97.5% CI: 2.70-5.30%; P<0.001), and 89.8% (345/384) in the liberal strategy (absolute risk difference, 59.24%; 97.5% CI: 52.91-65.57%; odds ratio, 20.06; 97.5% CI: 12.74-31.57; P<0.001). No statistically significant differences were found in the composite of in-hospital complications and mortality by day 30 among the three strategies. Conclusion::The individualized red-cell transfusion strategy using the West-China-Liu’s Score reduced red-cell transfusion without increasing in-hospital complications and mortality by day 30 when compared with restrictive and liberal strategies in elective non-cardiac surgeries.Trial registration::ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01597232.

More
广告
作者 Liao Ren [1] Liu Jin [1] Zhang Wei [2] Zheng Hong [3] Zhu Zhaoqiong [4] Sun Haorui [5] Yu Zhangsheng [6] Jia Huiqun [7] Sun Yanyuan [8] Qin Li [9] Yu Wenli [10] Luo Zhen [1] Chen Yanqing [11] Zhang Kexian [12] Ma Lulu [13] Yang Hui [14] Wu Hong [15] Liu Limin [16] Yuan Fang [17] Xu Hongwei [1] Zhang Jianwen [2] Zhang Lei [3] Liu Dexing [4] Huang Han [18] 学术成果认领
作者单位 Department of Anesthesiology, Research Unit for Perioperative Stress Assessment and Clinical Decision, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2018RU012), West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China [1] Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450052, China [2] Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830054, China [3] Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical College, Zunyi, Guizhou 563003, China [4] Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China [5] Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Life Science and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China [6] Department of Anesthesiology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiangzhuang, Hebei 050019, China [7] Department of Anesthesiology, Xijing Hospital of the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710032, China [8] Department of Transfusion, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China [9] Department of Anesthesiology, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin 300192, China [10] Department of Anesthesiology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian 350001, China [11] Department of Anesthesiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital amp; Institute, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China [12] Department of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing 100032, China [13] Department of Anesthesiology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430030, China [14] Department of Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China [15] Department of Orthopedic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China [16] Department of Anesthesiology, General Hospital Affiliated to Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300052, China [17] Department of Anesthesiology and Translational Neuroscience Center, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China [18]
栏目名称 Original Article
DOI 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002584
发布时间 2025-02-25
  • 浏览1
  • 下载0
中华医学杂志英文版

中华医学杂志英文版

2023年136卷23期

2857-2866页

SCIMEDLINEISTICCSCDCABP

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

扩展文献

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷