• 医学文献
  • 知识库
  • 评价分析
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

医学文献>>
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批

Tenecteplase versus alteplase in treatment of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A randomized non-inferiority trial

Tenecteplase versus alteplase in treatment of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A randomized non-inferiority trial

摘要Background::A phase II trial on recombinant human tenecteplase tissue-type plasminogen activator (rhTNK-tPA) has previously shown its preliminary efficacy in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. This study was designed as a pivotal postmarketing trial to compare its efficacy and safety with rrecombinant human tissue-type plasminogen activator alteplase (rt-PA) in Chinese patients with STEMI.Methods::In this multicenter, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial, patients with acute STEMI were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive an intravenous bolus of 16 mg rhTNK-tPA or an intravenous bolus of 8 mg rt-PA followed by an infusion of 42 mg in 90 min. The primary endpoint was recanalization defined by thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade 2 or 3. The secondary endpoint was clinically justified recanalization. Other endpoints included 30-day major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) and safety endpoints.Results::From July 2016 to September 2019, 767 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive rhTNK-tPA ( n = 384) or rt-PA ( n = 383). Among them, 369 patients had coronary angiography data on TIMI flow, and 711 patients had data on clinically justified recanalization. Both used a –15% difference as the non-inferiority efficacy margin. In comparison to rt-PA, both the proportion of patients with TIMI grade 2 or 3 flow (78.3% [148/189] vs. 81.7% [147/180]; differences: –3.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: –11.5%, 4.8%) and clinically justified recanalization (85.4% [305/357] vs. 85.9% [304/354]; difference: –0.5%; 95% CI: –5.6%, 4.7%) in the rhTNK-tPA group were non-inferior. The occurrence of 30-day MACCEs (10.2% [39/384] vs. 11.0% [42/383]; hazard ratio: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.61, 1.50) did not differ significantly between groups. No safety outcomes significantly differed between groups. Conclusion::rhTNK-tPA was non-inferior to rt-PA in the effect of improving recanalization of the infarct-related artery, a validated surrogate of clinical outcomes, among Chinese patients with acute STEMI.Trial registration::www.ClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT02835534).

更多

abstractsBackground::A phase II trial on recombinant human tenecteplase tissue-type plasminogen activator (rhTNK-tPA) has previously shown its preliminary efficacy in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. This study was designed as a pivotal postmarketing trial to compare its efficacy and safety with rrecombinant human tissue-type plasminogen activator alteplase (rt-PA) in Chinese patients with STEMI.Methods::In this multicenter, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial, patients with acute STEMI were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive an intravenous bolus of 16 mg rhTNK-tPA or an intravenous bolus of 8 mg rt-PA followed by an infusion of 42 mg in 90 min. The primary endpoint was recanalization defined by thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade 2 or 3. The secondary endpoint was clinically justified recanalization. Other endpoints included 30-day major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) and safety endpoints.Results::From July 2016 to September 2019, 767 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive rhTNK-tPA ( n = 384) or rt-PA ( n = 383). Among them, 369 patients had coronary angiography data on TIMI flow, and 711 patients had data on clinically justified recanalization. Both used a –15% difference as the non-inferiority efficacy margin. In comparison to rt-PA, both the proportion of patients with TIMI grade 2 or 3 flow (78.3% [148/189] vs. 81.7% [147/180]; differences: –3.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: –11.5%, 4.8%) and clinically justified recanalization (85.4% [305/357] vs. 85.9% [304/354]; difference: –0.5%; 95% CI: –5.6%, 4.7%) in the rhTNK-tPA group were non-inferior. The occurrence of 30-day MACCEs (10.2% [39/384] vs. 11.0% [42/383]; hazard ratio: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.61, 1.50) did not differ significantly between groups. No safety outcomes significantly differed between groups. Conclusion::rhTNK-tPA was non-inferior to rt-PA in the effect of improving recanalization of the infarct-related artery, a validated surrogate of clinical outcomes, among Chinese patients with acute STEMI.Trial registration::www.ClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT02835534).

More
广告
作者 Zhao Xingshan [1] Zhu Yidan [2] Zhang Zheng [3] Tao Guizhou [4] Xu Haiyan [5] Cheng Guanchang [6] Gao Wen [7] Ma Liping [8] Qi Liping [9] Yan Xiaoyan [1] Wang Haibo [1] Xia Qingde [10] Yang Yuwang [11] Li Wanke [12] Rong Juwen [13] Wang Limei [14] Ding Yutian [15] Guo Qiang [16] Dang Wanjun [17] Yao Chen [1] Yang Qin [18] Gao Runlin [5] Wu Yangfeng [2] Qiao Shubin [5] 学术成果认领
作者单位 Department of Cardiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Peking University, Beijing 100035, China [1] Peking University Clinical Research Institute, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100191, China [2] Department of Cardiology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730013, China [3] Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning 110002, China [4] Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China [5] Department of Cardiology, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan 450001, China [6] Department of Cardiology, Bayannur Hospital, Bayannur, Inner Mongolia 015208, China [7] Department of Cardiology, Puyang People’s Hospital, Puyang, Henan 457099, China [8] Department of Cardiology, Xingtai Third Hospital, Xingtai, Hebei 054099, China [9] Department of Cardiology, Lintao County People’s Hospital, Dingxi, Gansu 730599, China [10] Department of Cardiology, Dancheng County People’s Hospital, Zhoukou, Henan 477150, China [11] Department of Cardiology, The First People’s Hospital of Lingbao, Sanmenxia, Henan 472500, China [12] Department of Cardiology, Shanyin County People’s Hospital, Shuozhou, Shanxi 036999, China [13] Department of Cardiology, Uxin Banner People’s Hospital, Ordos, Inner Mongolia 017399, China [14] Department of Cardiology, Lingqiu County People’s Hospital, Datong, Shanxi 034499, China [15] Department of Cardiology, Huaibin County People’s Hospital, Xinyang, Henan 464411, China [16] Department of Cardiology, Tianzhu County People’s Hospital, Wuwei, Gansu 733200, China [17] Guangzhou Recomgen Biotech Co., Ltd, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510530, China [18]
栏目名称 Original Article
DOI 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002731
发布时间 2025-02-25
  • 浏览15
  • 下载0
中华医学杂志英文版

中华医学杂志英文版

2024年137卷3期

312-319页

SCIMEDLINEISTICCSCDCABP

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

扩展文献

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷