• 医学文献
  • 知识库
  • 评价分析
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

医学文献 >>
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批

机器人辅助与常规全髋关节置换术早期疗效及患者满意度的比较

Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction between robotic-assisted and conventional total hip arthroplasty

摘要:

目的:探讨机器人辅助全髋关节置换术(total hip arthroplasty,THA)与常规THA术后早期疗效及患者满意度的差异。方法:回顾性分析北京大学第三医院骨科在2019年9月至2022年2月因骨关节炎、股骨头坏死等原因接受由同一名术者使用同一品牌假体单侧初次THA手术患者171例。根据手术方式分为机器人辅助组和常规手术组。术后摄骨盆正位及髋关节穿桌侧位X线片,观察两组患者总失血量、输血率、住院时间、术后并发症、术后髋臼假体前倾角及外展角、髋臼假体位于Lewinnek和Callanan安全区的比例、疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、Harris髋关节功能评分、生活质量评分(quality of life,QOL)及患者满意度评分。结果:两组患者性别、年龄、身高、体重、体质指数、手术侧别、术前血容量及术前Harris髋关节功能评分的差异均无统计学意义( P>0.05)。2例患者因骨质疏松症导致机器人定位螺钉松动,术中改为常规手术。常规手术组87例术后随访时间为(19.7±6.8)个月,机器人辅助组84例为(18.6±5.4)个月,差异无统计学意义( t=1.16, P=0.249)。机器人辅助组的手术时间为(106.99±31.91)min,较常规手术组的(73.79±29.48)min延长,差异有统计学意义( t=7.07, P<0.001)。常规手术组住院时间为(6.40±2.40)d,机器人辅助组(6.49±1.95)d,差异无统计学意义( t=0.26, P=0.796);术后第3天时两组患者总失血量、输血率的差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)。常规手术组患者髋臼外展角为38.79°±6.93°、前倾角为14.81°±6.49°,机器人辅助组分别为39.41°±3.01°和13.33°±4.32°,差异无统计学意义( t=0.58, P=0.449; t=3.06, P=0.082)。机器人辅助组髋臼假体位于Lewinnek安全区的比例为96.4%,位于Callanan安全区为92.9%,高于常规手术组的73.6%和65.5%,差异均有统计学意义(χ 2=15.60, P<0.001;χ 2=17.61, P<0.001)。常规手术组与机器人辅助组患者术后VAS评分、Harris髋关节功能评分和QOL评分的差异均无统计学意义( P>0.05)。但是常规手术组Harris髋关节功能评分优良率为83.9%(73/87),低于机器人辅助组的95.2%(80/84),差异有统计学意义(χ 2=5.83, P=0.016)。机器人辅助组术后患者总体满意度优于常规手术组( Z=-3.47, P=0.001),其中机器人辅助组非常满意的患者占比95.2%(80/84),高于常规手术组的75.9%(66/87);机器人辅助组对疼痛缓解和提高休闲活动能力的满意度优于常规手术组( Z=-2.44, P=0.015; Z=-2.12, P=0.034),但两组患者对术后家务能力满意度的差异无统计学意义( Z=-0.49, P=0.626)。 结论:与常规THA相比,机器人辅助THA手术时间延长,但术后早期临床效果更佳,患者满意度更高。

更多
abstracts:

Objective:To compare short-term clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction between robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) and conventional THA.Methods:Patient data of unilateral primary THA with the same prosthesis by the same operator due to osteoarthritis, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and other diseases in Peking University Third Hospital from September 2019 to February 2022 was retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into robot-assisted THA group and conventional THA group according to surgical methods. The preoperative general data, operation time, intraoperative complications and other intraoperative data were collected. Anteroposterior X-ray of pelvis and cross-table X-ray of hip were taken. Main outcome measures consisted of total blood loss, blood transfusion rate, hospitalization stay, postoperative complications, and the inclination and anteversion angle of the acetabular cup, while the dislocation rate outside the Lewinnek and Callanan safe zone was also analyzed. Other outcomes measures included visual analogue scale, Harris score, quality of life score (QOL) and satisfaction score.Results:There was no significant difference in gender, age, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), operation side, preoperative blood volume and Harris score between the two groups ( P>0.05); Loosening of positioning screws occurred in 2 patients due to osteoporosis in robot-assisted THA group, so conventional THA was performed. Therefore, 84 cases in robot-assisted THA group and 87 cases in conventional THA group were enrolled in this study at last. There was no significant difference in follow-up time between conventional THA group and robot-assisted THA group (19.7±6.8 months vs. 18.6±5.4 months, t=1.16, P=0.249); The operation time of robot-assisted THA group was longer than that of conventional THA group (106.99±31.91 min vs. 73.79±29.48 min, t=7.07, P<0.001), but there was no significant difference in hospitalization stay between conventional THA group and robot-assisted THA group (6.40±2.40 d vs. 6.49±1.95 d, t=0.26, P=0.796). There was also no significant difference in total blood loss and blood transfusion rate between the two groups ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in inclination angle (38.79°±6.93° vs. 39.41°±3.01°, t=0.58, P=0.449) and anteversion angle (14.81°±6.49° vs. 13.33°±4.32°, t=3.06, P=0.082) between conventional THA group and robot-assisted THA group, while the percentage in Lewinnek safe zone (96.4% vs. 73.6%, χ 2=15.60, P<0.001) and Callanan safe zone (92.9% vs. 65.5%, χ 2=17.61, P<0.001) was significantly higher in conventional THA than that of robot-assisted THA. There were no significant differences in postoperative VAS, Harris score and QOL score between the two groups ( P>0.05), but the excellent and good rate of Harris score of conventional THA group was lower than that of robot-assisted THA group (83.91% vs. 95.24%, χ 2=5.83, P=0.016); The overall satisfaction of patients in robot-assisted THA group was better than that in conventional THA group ( Z=-3.47, P=0.001), and 95.2% (80/84) of patients in robot-assisted THA group were very satisfied, which was higher than that in conventional THA group (75.86%, 66/87). The satisfaction of patients in robot-assisted THA group on pain relief ( Z=-2.44, P=0.015) and improvement of leisure activity ( Z=-2.12, P=0.034) was better than that in conventional THA group, but there was no significant difference in the satisfaction of ability of doing house work between the two groups ( Z=-0.49, P=0.626). Conclusion:Compared with conventional THA, robot-assisted THA has longer operation time but better short-term clinical outcomes and higher patient satisfaction after surgery.

More
作者: 王鑫光 [1] 何宜蓁 [1] 董子漾 [1] 耿霄 [1] 王程 [1] 李杨 [1] 李子剑 [1] 田华 [1]
期刊: 《中华骨科杂志》2023年43卷8期 492-499页 ISTICPKUCSCD
栏目名称: 临床论著
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20220904-00520
发布时间: 2024-03-19
基金项目:
北京市自然科学基金 Beijing Natural Science Foundation Program
  • 浏览:61
  • 下载:0

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

扩展文献

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷