摘要目的:通过可视化分析评估国内外健康老龄化研究发展脉络及热点趋势。方法:以“健康老龄化”“healthy aging”“aging well”等为检索词，检索中国知网、万方、维普、中国生物医学数据库、PubMed、Web of Science数据库收录的健康老龄化领域相关文献，检索时间范围为2004年1月至2023年12月。基于文献计量学的原理，借助CiteSpace、VOS viewer等可视化分析软件，对相关研究发文量、作者合作、发文机构、研究热点及趋势进行科学知识图谱绘制。结果:共纳入中文文献1 322篇，英文文献2 569篇，中英文数据库发文量整体呈上升趋势。中文文献包含2 381名学者，核心作者83名，发文量排名前3的作者分别是胡志（14篇）、秦侠（13篇）、陆杰华（10篇）；英文文献包含13 989名学者，交流合作密切，其中核心作者391名，发文量排名前15的作者中有8名美国学者。中文文献发文量排名前3的机构分别是北京大学（38篇）、复旦大学（20篇）、安徽医科大学（20篇）；英文文献发文量排名前3的机构分别是匹兹堡大学（127篇）、伦敦大学学院（79篇）、悉尼大学（78篇）。中文文献共纳入605个关键词，存在886条连线，除主题词外出现次数较多的关键词为医养结合（103次）、健康状况（78次）、积极老龄化（77次）；中文文献聚类分析得到11个聚类模块，英文文献得到6个聚类模块；我国健康老龄化研究大致可分为3个发展阶段（2004—2009年、2010—2018年、2019—2023年）；近4年内中文文献突现词为“老龄工作”“积极老龄观”“政策供给”“养老服务体系”“老年健康服务”和“老龄社会”，英文文献突现词为“senescence”（衰老）、“perspective”（观点）和“public health”（公共卫生）。结论:健康老龄化研究热度整体呈上升趋势，英文发文量及合作关系整体高于中文，当前主要研究热点为政策供给、老年健康服务、公共卫生，国内外差异较大。

abstractsObjective:To evaluate the development context and hot trends in healthy aging research in China and abroad with visual analysis.Methods:Using “healthy aging” and “aging well” as search terms, relevant literatures in the field of healthy aging were retrieved in the databases of CNKI, WanFang, VIP, CBM, PubMed and Web of Science. The search period was from January 2004 to December 2023. Based on the principle of bibliometrics, with the help of visualization analysis software such as CiteSpace and VOS viewer, the scientific knowledge map was drawn for the number of relevant research publications, author cooperation, publishing institutions, research hotspots and trends.Results:A total of 1 322 Chinese articles and 2 569 English articles were included, and the number of articles published in Chinese and English showed an upward trend as a whole. The Chinese literature included 2 381 scholars, with 83 core authors. The top three most published authors were Hu Zhi (14 articles), Qin Xia (13 articles) and Lu Jiehua (10 articles). The English literature contained 13 989 scholars with close communication and cooperation, of which there are 391 core authors; among the top 15 authors, 8 are American scholars. The top 3 institutions in terms of Chinese literature volume were Peking University (38 articles), Fudan University (20 articles) and Anhui Medical University (20 articles), while the top 3 institutions in English literature volume were University of Pittsburgh (127 articles), University College London (79 articles) and University of Sydney (78 articles). A total of 605 keywords were included in Chinese literatures, and there were 886 connections among the keywords of the literature. The keywords appeared most frequently except subject words were medical and nursing combination (103 times), health status (78 times) and active aging (77 times). There were 11 clustering modules in Chinese literature cluster analysis and 6 clustering modules in English literature. The research on healthy aging in China could be roughly divided into three stages, namely 2004—2009, 2010—2018 and 2019—2023. In recent 4 years, the prominent words in Chinese literature were “aging work” “positive view of old age”“policy supply”“old-age service system”“elderly health service” and“aging society”，while the prominent words in English literature were “senescence”“perspective” and “public health”.Conclusions:The popularity of healthy aging research is on the rise overall, and the number of articles and cooperative relations in English is higher than that in Chinese. At present, the main research hotspots are policy supply, elderly health services, public health and wide variation in China and abroad.