摘要《医学纲目》40卷，明代楼英编纂。其以脏腑为纲，以治法为目，选取“上自《内经》，下至历代圣贤书传及诸家名方”，辑录了大量明以前的医学资料，具有独特的文献研究价值。通过对比《医学纲目》和《证类本草》发现，《医学纲目》转引自《证类本草》的文献有577条，其中涉及到的文献或者医家简称78个，涵盖了66种古籍或医家的著述。《医学纲目》中共有220个简称，从《证类本草》中找到的有78个。可见《证类本草》一书在《医学纲目》的编纂过程中发挥着重要的作用。与此同时，《医学纲目》引用《证类本草》时出现了诸多错误，诸如未核对原始文献或不知起始位置导致的出处错误，人名脱字或乙倒，简称引起的混淆，形近致误，同一书出现不同的简称。上述内容对于认识《医学纲目》的引文体例及利用这些引文进行文献研究提供了可靠的基础。

abstractsCompendium of Medicine (Yi Xue Gang Mu) has forty volumes, compiled by Lou Ying in the Ming Dynasty. The classification of this book was based on the diseases of viscera and relevant treatment methods. It has unique literature research value because it involved a large number of medical literature before the Ming Dynasty including Inner canon of Huang Di and many great works of popular physicians after that. By comparing Compendium of Medicine (Yi Sue Gang Mu) with Classified Materia Medica (Zheng Lei Ben Cao), it can be seen that there are 577 references from Classified Materia Medica in Compendium of Medicine, involving 78 archive or physician abbreviation with 66 ancient books or works of doctors. This means that 78 abbreviation in Compendium of Medicine were out of 220 abbreviation in Classified Materia Medica. Therefore, it indicates that Classified Materia Medica plays an important role in Compendium of Medicine compiling. In the process of citing Classified Materia Medica, Compendium of Medicine made some mistakes of citation, such as wrong provenance because of the original sources unchecked or the trace unknown, wrong spelling of names, confusion because of abbreviation, misunderstanding because of similarity, and a book with different names. These issues of citation style of Compendium of Medicine and their utilisation in practice provide meaningful references for textual research.