显微镜下微创肌间隙寰枢侧块融合术与开放寰枢融合固定术对寰枢椎脱位的疗效比较
Efficacy comparison of minimally invasive atlantoaxial mass fusion and open atlantoaxial fusion in the treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation
摘要目的:比较显微镜下微创肌间隙寰枢侧块融合术(Mis-PALF)和开放寰枢融合固定术对寰枢椎脱位的临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析2015年9月至2021年9月在北京大学第三医院接受Mis-PALF手术治疗(17例)或开放寰枢融合固定术(88例,作为对照)的寰枢椎脱位患者的临床资料。Mis-PALF组男9例,女8例,年龄(45.8±19.8)岁;对照组男48例,女40例,年龄(50.0±13.9)岁。比较两组手术时间、围术期出血量、术后体温、术后疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、术后追加止痛药物情况、术后住院时间、随访日本骨科协会(JOA)评分改善率以及并发症等指标。结果:Mis-PALF组围术期出血量较开放组减少[(111.8±35.9)ml比(362.9±18.6)ml, P<0.01]、住院时间较短[(3.06±0.63)d比(4.24±0.14)d, P<0.01]、追加止痛药物人数较少(3/17比56/88, P<0.01)。两组手术时间[(125±7)min比(113±8)min, P=0.525]、术后发热(11/17比37/88, P=0.086)、术后VAS>3分比例(1/17比13/88, P=0.357)、随访JOA改善率(66.9%±28.8%比74.2%±28.6%, P=0.409)及并发症发生率(1/17比3/88, P=1.000)等指标差异均无统计学意义。 结论:相比开放寰枢融合固定术,在寰枢椎脱位患者中,Mis-PALF能显著减少围术期出血量、缩短术后住院时间、减少止痛药物使用,同时不增加并发症的发生。
更多相关知识
abstractsObjective:To compare the clinical effects of minimally invasive intermuscular atlantoaxial lateral mass fusion (Mis-PALF) and open atlantoaxial fusion in patients with atlantoaxial dislocation.Methods:The clinical data of patients with atlantoaxial dislocation who received Mis-PALF operation (17 cases) or open atlantoaxial fusion (88 cases, as control) in the Third Hospital of Peking University from September 2015 to September 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. In Mis-PALF group, there were 9 males and 8 females, aged (45.8±19.8) years; and there were 48 males and 40 females in the control group, aged (50.0±13.9) years. The operation time, perioperative blood loss, postoperative body temperature, postoperative pain [assessed with visual analogue scale (VAS)], postoperative additional analgesic drugs, postoperative hospitalization time, the improvement rate of Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores of spinal cord function in three-months follow-up and complications were compared between the two groups.Results:Mis-PALF group had less perioperative blood loss than control group [(111.8±35.9)ml vs (362.9±18.6)ml, P<0.01], shorter hospitalization time [(3.06±0.63) days vs (4.24±0.14) days, P<0.01] and fewer additional analgesic drugs (3/17 vs 56/88, P<0.01). There was no significant difference between the Mis-PALF and control group in operation time [(125±7)min vs (113±8)min, P=0.525], patients with fever(11/17 vs 37/88, P=0.086) or postoperative pain (1/17 vs 13/88, P=0.357), the improvement rate of JOA score (66.9%±28.8% vs 74.2%±28.6%, P=0.409) and complications rate (1/17 vs 3/88, P=1.000). Conclusion:Mis-PALF can significantly reduce the perioperative blood loss, shorten the postoperative hospitalization time and the additionally use of analgesic drugs without increasing complications.
More相关知识
- 浏览122
- 被引7
- 下载0

相似文献
- 中文期刊
- 外文期刊
- 学位论文
- 会议论文


换一批



