医学文献 >>
  • 检索发现
  • 增强检索
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
默认
×
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

苯磺酸氨氯地平与硝苯地平治疗原发性高血压的效果比较

Comparison effects of amlodipine besylate versus nifedipine on patients with essential hypertension

摘要目的:比较苯磺酸氨氯地平与硝苯地平应用于原发性高血压治疗中的临床效果。方法:抽取阳泉市第三人民院2018年2月至2019年2月收治的110例原发性高血压患者为实验对象,依据随机数字表法将入选患者分为观察组( n=55例)及对照组( n=55例),其中对照组行硝苯地平治疗,观察组行苯磺酸氨氯地平治疗。观察比较两组患者的临床疗效、不良反应、舒张压(DBP)及收缩压(SBP)、血清肌酐(Scr)、内生肌酐清除率(Ccr)及其尿素氮(BUN)。 结果:治疗后,观察组总有效率(96.36%)与对照组(74.55%)比较,差异有统计学意义(χ 2=10.532, P<0.05)。观察组患者SBP[(129.44±8.57)mmHg,1 mmHg=0.133kPa]低于对照组[(140.35±1.67)mmHg, P<0.05];DBP[(89.05±2.33)mmHg]低于对照组[(94.7±3.88)mmHg, P<0.05]。观察组的BUN、Scr、Ccr低于对照组,差异有统计学意义( P<0.05)。治疗后,观察组的总不良反应率(5.45%)与对照组(21.85%)比较,差异有统计学意义(χ 2=6.253, P<0.05)。 结论:与硝苯地平相比,苯磺酸氨氯地平应用于原发性高血压治疗中具有较高的临床价值,能显著改善患者肾功能,且不良反应少,降压效果显著。

更多

abstractsObjective:To compare the clinical effect of amlodipine bysylate and nifedipine on essential hypertension.Methods:A total of 110 patients with essential hypertension admitted to Yangquan Third People's Hospital from February 2018 to February 2019 were selected as the experimental subjects, and were divided into observation group ( n= 55) and control group ( n= 55). The control group was treated with nifedipine and observation group was treated with amlodipine besylate. The clinical effects, adverse reactions, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and systolic blood pressure (SBP), serum creatine (Scr), clearance rate (Ccr) and urea nitrogen (BUN) of the two groups were observed and compared. Results:After treatment, the total effective rate of observation group (96.36%) was higher than that of control group (74.55%), there was significant difference between the two groups(χ 2=10.532, P<0.05). The SBP of the patients in observation group [(129.44 ±8.57) mmHg, 1 mmHg=0.133 kPa], was significantly lower than that in control group [(140.35±1.67) mmHg, P<0.05], and the DBP in observation group was (89.05 ±2.33) mmHg, which was significantly lower than that in control group [(94.7 0±3.88) mmHg, P< 0.05]. The BUN, Scr, Ccr in observation group were significantly lower than those in control group ( P< 0.05). After treatment, the total adverse reaction rate of observation group (5.45%) was significantly higher than that of control group, there was significant difference between the two groups(χ 2=6.253, P<0.05). Conclusions:Compared with nifedipine, amlodipine bysylate have higher clinical value in the treatment of essential hypertension, which can significantly improve the renal function of patients, and has less adverse reactions, and significantly antihypertensive effect.

More
广告
作者 李慧芳 [1] 王秀英 [2] 学术成果认领
作者单位 山西省阳泉市第三人民药剂科 045000 [1] 山西省阳泉市第三人民肾内科 045000 [2]
栏目名称
DOI 10.3760/cma.j.cn115689-20191207-08763
发布时间 2020-04-25(万方平台首次上网日期,不代表论文的发表时间)
  • 浏览56
  • 下载13
中国实用医刊

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

扩展文献

法律状态公告日 法律状态 法律状态信息

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new医文AI 翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷