首页> Annals of Emergency Medicine: Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians and the University Association for Emergency Medicine> Are two drugs better than one for acute agitation? A discussion on black box warnings, waiver of informed consent, and the ethics of enrolling impaired subjects in clinical trials

Are two drugs better than one for acute agitation? A discussion on black box warnings, waiver of informed consent, and the ethics of enrolling impaired subjects in clinical trials

导出原文传递

翻译打印收藏纠错

第一作者： Eucker,S.A.

作者： Eucker,S.A. ^[1] ; Barrett,T.W. ^[2] ; Schriger,D.L. ^[3]

作者单位： University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States ^[1] University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States ^[2] Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States ^[3]

发布时间 2013-11-20

翻译满意度评价：

准确一般字义偏差语意偏离译文作用小提交

浏览0

Annals of Emergency Medicine

2013年61卷1期

82-83页

相似文献

中文期刊
外文期刊
学位论文
会议论文

浏览0

点击下载本期目录封面

Annals of Emergency Medicine

2013年61卷1期

82-83页

检索历史清除

Are two drugs better than one for acute agitation? A discussion on black box warnings, waiver of informed consent, and the ethics of enrolling impaired subjects in clinical trials

Annals of Emergency Medicine

相似文献

同项目论文

Annals of Emergency Medicine

相关期刊

参考文献：
指定格式：	NoteExpress EndNote RefWorks NoteFirst

检索历史 清除

Are two drugs better than one for acute agitation? A discussion on black box warnings, waiver of informed consent, and the ethics of enrolling impaired subjects in clinical trials

Annals of Emergency Medicine

相似文献

同项目论文

Annals of Emergency Medicine

相关期刊

检索历史清除