Pro/con clinical debate: High-frequency oscillatory ventilation is better than conventional ventilation for premature infants.

导出 OA

翻译打印收藏纠错

作者： Sherry E,Courtney ^[1] ; David J,Durand ; Jeanette M,Asselin ; Eric C,Eichenwald ; Ann R,Stark

作者单位： Neonatologist, Division of Neonatology, Schneider Children's Hospital, North Shore Long Island Jewish Health System, New Hyde Park, NY, USA. ^[1]

主题词医务工作者的态度(Attitude of Health Personnel);高频喷射通气(High-Frequency Jet Ventilation);人类(Humans);婴儿, 新生(Infant, Newborn);婴儿, 早产(Infant, Premature);呼吸, 人工(Respiration, Artificial);呼吸窘迫综合征, 新生儿(Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn)

DOI 10.1186/cc2178

PMID 14624681

发布时间 2022-04-09

翻译满意度评价：

准确一般字义偏差语意偏离译文作用小提交

浏览2

Critical care (London, England)

2003年7卷6期

423-6页

相似文献

中文期刊
外文期刊
学位论文
会议论文

检索历史清除

Pro/con clinical debate: High-frequency oscillatory ventilation is better than conventional ventilation for premature infants.

Critical care (London, England)

相似文献

Critical care (London, England)

相关期刊

参考文献：
指定格式：	NoteExpress EndNote RefWorks NoteFirst

检索历史 清除

Pro/con clinical debate: High-frequency oscillatory ventilation is better than conventional ventilation for premature infants.

Critical care (London, England)

相似文献

Critical care (London, England)

相关期刊

检索历史清除