Using logic models to capture complexity in systematic reviews.

导出 LinkOut

翻译打印收藏纠错

作者： Laurie M,Anderson ^[1] ; Mark,Petticrew ^[2] ; Eva,Rehfuess ^[3] ; Rebecca,Armstrong ^[4] ; Erin,Ueffing ^[5] ; Phillip,Baker ^[6] ; Daniel,Francis ^[7] ; Peter,Tugwell ^[8]

作者单位： Washington State Institute for Public Policy, Olympia, Washington, USA. LAnderson@wsipp.wa.gov. ^[1] London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London, London, UK. ^[2] Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany. ^[3] Cochrane Public Health Review Group, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. ^[4] Institute of Population Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. ^[5] Central Regional Services, Queensland Health, Australia and School of Public Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia. ^[6] Central Regional Services, Queensland Health, Australia. ^[7] Institute of Population Health and Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, and Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. ^[8]

关键词 logic models population health program evaluation social welfare systematic reviews

DOI 10.1002/jrsm.32

PMID 26061598

发布时间 2022-03-30

翻译满意度评价：

准确一般字义偏差语意偏离译文作用小提交

浏览40

Research synthesis methods

2011年2卷1期

33-42页

相似文献

中文期刊
外文期刊
学位论文
会议论文

检索历史清除

Using logic models to capture complexity in systematic reviews.

Research synthesis methods

相似文献

Research synthesis methods

相关期刊

参考文献：
指定格式：	NoteExpress EndNote RefWorks NoteFirst

检索历史 清除

Using logic models to capture complexity in systematic reviews.

Research synthesis methods

相似文献

Research synthesis methods

相关期刊

检索历史清除