Frequency of discrepancies in retracted clinical trial reports versus unretracted reports: blinded case-control study.

导出 OA

翻译打印收藏纠错

作者： Graham D,Cole ^[1] ; Alexandra N,Nowbar ^[2] ; Michael,Mielewczik ^[2] ; Matthew J,Shun-Shin ^[2] ; Darrel P,Francis ^[2]

作者单位： International Centre for Circulatory Health, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London W2 1LA, UK g.cole@imperial.ac.uk. ^[1] International Centre for Circulatory Health, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London W2 1LA, UK. ^[2]

主题词病例对照研究(Case-Control Studies);人类(Humans);期刊影响因子(Journal Impact Factor);比值比(Odds Ratio);PubMed(PubMed);出版倾向性(Publication Bias);回顾性研究(Retrospective Studies);科学上不正当行为(Scientific Misconduct)

DOI 10.1136/bmj.h4708

PMID 26387520

发布时间 2022-01-29

翻译满意度评价：

准确一般字义偏差语意偏离译文作用小提交

浏览0

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)

2015年351卷

h4708页

相似文献

中文期刊
外文期刊
学位论文
会议论文

检索历史清除

Frequency of discrepancies in retracted clinical trial reports versus unretracted reports: blinded case-control study.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)

相似文献

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)

相关期刊

参考文献：
指定格式：	NoteExpress EndNote RefWorks NoteFirst

检索历史 清除

Frequency of discrepancies in retracted clinical trial reports versus unretracted reports: blinded case-control study.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)

相似文献

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)

相关期刊

检索历史清除