Nano-flow vs standard-flow: Which is the more suitable LC/MS method for quantifying hepcidin-25 in human serum in routine clinical settings?

导出 LinkOut

翻译打印收藏纠错

作者： Jérôme,Vialaret ^[1] ; Alexia,Picas ^[1] ; Constance,Delaby ^[1] ; Pauline,Bros ^[1] ; Sylvain,Lehmann ^[1] ; Christophe,Hirtz ^[2]

作者单位： University of Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, IRMB, LBPC, Montpellier F-34000, France. ^[1] University of Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, IRMB, LBPC, Montpellier F-34000, France. Electronic address: c-hirtz@chu-montpellier.fr. ^[2]

关键词 Hepcidin Iron deficiency Mass spectrometry Nano LC Standard LC

主题词色谱法, 高压液相(Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid);女(雌)性(Female);人类(Humans);检测限(Limit of Detection);线性模型(Linear Models);男(雄)性(Male);质谱分析法(Mass Spectrometry);中年人(Middle Aged);纳米技术(Nanotechnology);结果可重复性(Reproducibility of Results)

DOI 10.1016/j.jchromb.2018.04.003

PMID 29660664

发布时间 2018-05-14

翻译满意度评价：

准确一般字义偏差语意偏离译文作用小提交

浏览0

Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences

2018年1086卷

110-117页

相似文献

中文期刊
外文期刊
学位论文
会议论文

检索历史清除

Nano-flow vs standard-flow: Which is the more suitable LC/MS method for quantifying hepcidin-25 in human serum in routine clinical settings?

Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences

相似文献

Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences

相关期刊

参考文献：
指定格式：	NoteExpress EndNote RefWorks NoteFirst

检索历史 清除

Nano-flow vs standard-flow: Which is the more suitable LC/MS method for quantifying hepcidin-25 in human serum in routine clinical settings?

Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences

相似文献

Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences

相关期刊

检索历史清除