首页> Frontiers in psychology> Is There a Conjunction Fallacy in Legal Probabilistic Decision Making?

Is There a Conjunction Fallacy in Legal Probabilistic Decision Making?

导出 LinkOut

翻译打印收藏纠错

第一作者： Bartosz W,Wojciechowski

第一单位： Department of Clinical and Forensic Psychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Silesia of Katowice, Katowice, Poland.

作者： Bartosz W,Wojciechowski ^[1] ; Emmanuel M,Pothos ^[2]

作者单位： Department of Clinical and Forensic Psychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Silesia of Katowice, Katowice, Poland. ^[1] Department of Psychology, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom. ^[2]

关键词 conjunction fallacy legal decision making legal psychology quantum cognition quantum probability theory

DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00391

PMID 29674983

发布时间 2020-10-01

翻译满意度评价：

准确一般字义偏差语意偏离译文作用小提交

浏览0

Frontiers in psychology

2018年9卷

391页

相似文献

中文期刊
外文期刊
学位论文
会议论文

浏览0

点击下载本期目录封面

Frontiers in psychology

2018年9卷

391页

检索历史清除

Is There a Conjunction Fallacy in Legal Probabilistic Decision Making?

Frontiers in psychology

相似文献

同项目论文

Frontiers in psychology

相关期刊

参考文献：
指定格式：	NoteExpress EndNote RefWorks NoteFirst

检索历史 清除

Is There a Conjunction Fallacy in Legal Probabilistic Decision Making?

Frontiers in psychology

相似文献

同项目论文

Frontiers in psychology

相关期刊

检索历史清除