Reporting only relative effect measures was potentially misleading: some good practices for improving the soundness of epidemiological results.

导出 LinkOut

翻译打印收藏纠错

第一作者： Marco,Novelli

第一单位： Department of Statistical Sciences "Paolo Fortunati", University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. Electronic address: marco.novelli4@unibo.it.

作者： Marco,Novelli ^[1] ; Alessandro,Baldi Antognini ^[2] ; Paolo,Boffetta ^[3] ; John Pa,Ioannidis ^[4] ; Giovanna,Spatari ^[5] ; Francesco S,Violante ^[6]

作者单位： Department of Statistical Sciences "Paolo Fortunati", University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. Electronic address: marco.novelli4@unibo.it. ^[1] Department of Statistical Sciences "Paolo Fortunati", University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. ^[2] Stony Brook Cancer Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. ^[3] Stanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA. ^[4] Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy. ^[5] Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. ^[6]

关键词 Observational studies Relative risk Rounding error, Odds ratio, Confidence intervals Statistical precision

主题词流行病学研究(Epidemiologic Studies);人类(Humans);统计学(主题)(Statistics as Topic)

DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.04.006

PMID 33894329

发布时间 2021-11-10

翻译满意度评价：

准确一般字义偏差语意偏离译文作用小提交