A comparison of XRFS and ICP-OES methods for soil trace metal analyses in a mining impacted agricultural watershed.

导出 LinkOut

翻译打印收藏纠错

作者： Amy L,Sikora ^[1] ; Lane W,Maguire ^[2] ; Robert W,Nairn ^[3] ; Robert C,Knox ^[4]

作者单位： Center for Restoration of Ecosystems and Watersheds, School of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA. amy.sikora@outlook.com. ^[1] Center for Restoration of Ecosystems and Watersheds, School of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA. ^[2] Center for Restoration of Ecosystems and Watersheds, School of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA. nairn@ou.edu. ^[3] Center for Restoration of Ecosystems and Watersheds, School of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA. rknox@ou.edu. ^[4]

关键词 Heavy metals ICP-OES Loss-on-ignition Moisture content Soil trace metals XRF

主题词环境监测(Environmental Monitoring);采矿(Mining);俄克拉何马(Oklahoma);土壤(Soil);土壤污染物(Soil Pollutants);光谱法, X线发射(Spectrometry, X-Ray Emission)

DOI 10.1007/s10661-021-09275-9

PMID 34258666

发布时间 2021-07-15

翻译满意度评价：

准确一般字义偏差语意偏离译文作用小提交