Democratising or disrupting diagnosis? Ethical issues raised by the use of AI tools for rare disease diagnosis.

导出 LinkOut

翻译打印收藏纠错

第一作者： Nina,Hallowell

第一单位： The Ethox Centre and Wellcome Centre for Ethics & Humanities, Nuffield Department of Population Health and Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, UK.

作者： Nina,Hallowell ^[1] ; Shirlene,Badger ^[2] ; Francis,McKay ^[1] ; Angeliki,Kerasidou ^[1] ; Christoffer,Nellåker ^[3]

作者单位： The Ethox Centre and Wellcome Centre for Ethics & Humanities, Nuffield Department of Population Health and Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, UK. ^[1] Illumina, Inc, Cambridge, UK. ^[2] Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health and Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, UK. ^[3]

关键词 AI Computational phenotyping Diagnosis Qualitative interviews Rare disease

DOI 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100240

PMID 37426704

发布时间 2023-07-18

翻译满意度评价：

准确一般字义偏差语意偏离译文作用小提交

浏览0

SSM. Qualitative research in health

2023年3卷

100240页

相似文献

中文期刊
外文期刊
学位论文
会议论文

检索历史清除

Democratising or disrupting diagnosis? Ethical issues raised by the use of AI tools for rare disease diagnosis.

SSM. Qualitative research in health

相似文献

SSM. Qualitative research in health

相关期刊

参考文献：
指定格式：	NoteExpress EndNote RefWorks NoteFirst

检索历史 清除

Democratising or disrupting diagnosis? Ethical issues raised by the use of AI tools for rare disease diagnosis.

SSM. Qualitative research in health

相似文献

SSM. Qualitative research in health

相关期刊

检索历史清除