Increasing transparency in indirect treatment comparisons: is selecting effect modifiers the missing part of the puzzle? A review of methodological approaches and critical considerations.

导出 OA

翻译打印收藏纠错

第一作者： Andreas,Freitag

第一单位： Cytel, Evidence Value & Access, London, WC2B 4HN, UK.

作者： Andreas,Freitag ^[1] ; Laura,Gurskyte ^[2] ; Grammati,Sarri ^[3]

作者单位： Cytel, Evidence Value & Access, London, WC2B 4HN, UK. ^[1] Cytel, Evidence Value & Access, Rotterdam, 3012 NJ, The Netherlands. ^[2] Cytel, Real-World Advanced Analytics, London, WC2B 4HN, UK. ^[3]

关键词 comparative effectiveness effect modifier health technology assessment indirect treatment comparison literature review matching-adjusted indirect comparison network meta-analysis prognostic variable simulated treatment comparison

主题词人类(Humans);癌, 非小细胞肺(Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung);肺肿瘤(Lung Neoplasms);法国(France);德国(Germany)

DOI 10.57264/cer-2023-0046

PMID 37602779

发布时间 2023-12-05

翻译满意度评价：

准确一般字义偏差语意偏离译文作用小提交

浏览0

Journal of comparative effectiveness research

2023年12卷10期

e230046页

相似文献

中文期刊
外文期刊
学位论文
会议论文

检索历史清除

Increasing transparency in indirect treatment comparisons: is selecting effect modifiers the missing part of the puzzle? A review of methodological approaches and critical considerations.

Journal of comparative effectiveness research

相似文献

Journal of comparative effectiveness research

相关期刊

参考文献：
指定格式：	NoteExpress EndNote RefWorks NoteFirst

检索历史 清除

Increasing transparency in indirect treatment comparisons: is selecting effect modifiers the missing part of the puzzle? A review of methodological approaches and critical considerations.

Journal of comparative effectiveness research

相似文献

Journal of comparative effectiveness research

相关期刊

检索历史清除