What are the best methods for rapid reviews of the research evidence? A systematic review of reviews and primary studies.

导出 LinkOut

翻译打印收藏纠错

作者： Michelle M,Haby ^[1] ; Jorge Otávio Maia,Barreto ^[2] ; Jenny Yeon Hee,Kim ^[3] ; Sasha,Peiris ^[4] ; Cristián,Mansilla ^[1] ; Marcela,Torres ^[1] ; Diego Emmanuel,Guerrero-Magaña ^[5] ; Ludovic,Reveiz ^[6]

作者单位： Science and Knowledge Unit, Evidence and Intelligence for Action in Health Department, Pan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, USA. ^[1] Department of Chemical and Biological Sciences, University of Sonora, Hermosillo, Mexico. ^[2] Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. ^[3] Fiocruz Brasília, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Brasília, Brazil. ^[4] McMaster Health Forum, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. ^[5] Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. ^[6] Doctoral Program in Chemical and Biological Sciences and Health, Department of Chemical and Biological Sciences, University of Sonora, Hermosillo, Mexico. ^[7]

关键词 evidence synthesis rapid review methods recommendations risk of bias systematic review

主题词综述文献(主题)(Review Literature as Topic)

DOI 10.1002/jrsm.1664

PMID 37696668

发布时间 2024-03-20

翻译满意度评价：

准确一般字义偏差语意偏离译文作用小提交

浏览0

Research synthesis methods

2024年15卷1期

2-20页

相似文献

中文期刊
外文期刊
学位论文
会议论文

检索历史清除

What are the best methods for rapid reviews of the research evidence? A systematic review of reviews and primary studies.

Research synthesis methods

相似文献

Research synthesis methods

相关期刊

参考文献：
指定格式：	NoteExpress EndNote RefWorks NoteFirst

检索历史 清除

What are the best methods for rapid reviews of the research evidence? A systematic review of reviews and primary studies.

Research synthesis methods

相似文献

Research synthesis methods

相关期刊

检索历史清除