Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of MR dacryocystography (MRD) and dacryoscintigraphy (DSG) in NLDO-related acquired epiphora.

导出 LinkOut

翻译打印收藏纠错

作者： Ali Abzirakan,Aslanduz ^[1] ; Babak,Mahmoudian ^[1] ; Afshin Lotfi,Sadigh ^[2] ; Elham,Nahchami ^[3] ; Amirreza,Jahanshahi ^[4]

作者单位： Medical Radiation Sciences Research Team, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. ^[1] Department of Ophthalmology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. ^[2] Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran. ^[3] Medical Radiation Sciences Research Team, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. ar.jahanshahi@gmail.com. ^[4] Department of Radiology, Emam Reza Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. ar.jahanshahi@gmail.com. ^[5]

关键词 Acquired epiphora Dacryoscintigraphy (DSG)Diagnostic accuracy MR dacryocystography (MRD)Nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO)

主题词人类(Humans);缩窄, 病理性(Constriction, Pathologic);泪器疾病(Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases);鼻泪管(Nasolacrimal Duct);磁共振成像(Magnetic Resonance Imaging);泪器阻塞(Lacrimal Duct Obstruction);泪囊鼻腔吻合术(Dacryocystorhinostomy)

DOI 10.1007/s10792-024-02932-1

PMID 38363448

发布时间 2024-02-19

翻译满意度评价：

准确一般字义偏差语意偏离译文作用小提交