Outcomes after bioprosthetic versus mechanical mitral valve replacement for infective endocarditis in the United States.

导出 LinkOut

翻译打印收藏纠错

作者： Katie J,Hogan ^[1] ; Christopher B,Sylvester ^[2] ; Matthew J,Wall ^[3] ; Todd K,Rosengart ^[1] ; Joseph S,Coselli ^[2] ; Marc R,Moon ^[1] ; Subhasis,Chatterjee ^[1] ; Ravi K,Ghanta ^[4]

作者单位： Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex. ^[1] Medical Scientist Training Program, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex. ^[2] Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, Tex. ^[3] Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Tex. ^[4]

关键词 endocarditis mitral valve replacement readmissions

DOI 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.11.019

PMID 38420540

发布时间 2024-03-01

翻译满意度评价：

准确一般字义偏差语意偏离译文作用小提交

浏览0

JTCVS open

2024年17卷

74-83页

相似文献

中文期刊
外文期刊
学位论文
会议论文

检索历史清除

Outcomes after bioprosthetic versus mechanical mitral valve replacement for infective endocarditis in the United States.

JTCVS open

相似文献

JTCVS open

相关期刊

参考文献：
指定格式：	NoteExpress EndNote RefWorks NoteFirst

检索历史 清除

Outcomes after bioprosthetic versus mechanical mitral valve replacement for infective endocarditis in the United States.

JTCVS open

相似文献

JTCVS open

相关期刊

检索历史清除