How long is too long? No added benefit with prolonged ventilation with intact cord in preterm infants.

导出 OA

翻译打印收藏纠错

第一作者： Anup,Katheria

第一单位： Neonatal Research Institute, Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women & Newborns, San Diego, CA, USA.

作者： Anup,Katheria ^[1] ; Satyan,Lakshminrusimha ^[2]

作者单位： Neonatal Research Institute, Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women & Newborns, San Diego, CA, USA. ^[1] School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA. ^[2]

关键词 deferred cord clamping delayed cord clamping depressed newborns intact cord resuscitation non‐vigorous newborns physiological based cord clamping umbilical cord milking ventilation with an intact cord

主题词婴儿(Infant);婴儿, 新生(Infant, Newborn);人类(Humans);婴儿, 早产(Infant, Premature);孕龄(Gestational Age);呼吸(Respiration);脐带(Umbilical Cord);收缩(Constriction)

DOI 10.1113/JP286492

PMID 38602842

发布时间 2024-05-15

翻译满意度评价：

准确一般字义偏差语意偏离译文作用小提交

浏览0

The Journal of physiology

2024年602卷8期

1663-1664页

相似文献

中文期刊
外文期刊
学位论文
会议论文

检索历史清除

How long is too long? No added benefit with prolonged ventilation with intact cord in preterm infants.

The Journal of physiology

相似文献

The Journal of physiology

相关期刊

参考文献：
指定格式：	NoteExpress EndNote RefWorks NoteFirst

检索历史 清除

How long is too long? No added benefit with prolonged ventilation with intact cord in preterm infants.

The Journal of physiology

相似文献

The Journal of physiology

相关期刊

检索历史清除