A scoping review identifies multiple emerging knowledge synthesis methods, but few studies operationalize the method

导出原文传递

翻译打印收藏纠错

作者： Tricco, Andrea C. ^[1] ; Soobiah, Charlene ^[2] ; Antony, Jesmin ^[3] ; Cogo, Elise ^[4] ; MacDonald, Heather ; Lillie, Erin ; Tran, Judy ; D'Souza, Jennifer ; Hui, Wing ; Perrier, Laure ; Welch, Vivian ; Horsley, Tanya ; Straus, Sharon E. ; Kastner, Monika

作者单位： Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Hlth Sci Bldg,155 Coll St,Suite 425, Toronto ^[1] Bruyere Res Inst, 85 Primrose Ave, Ottawa, ON K1R 6M1, Canada ^[2] St Michaels Hosp, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, 209 Victoria St, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada ^[3] Royal Coll Phys & Surg Canada, Res Unit, 774 Echo Dr, Ottawa, ON K1S 5N8, Canada ^[4]

关键词 Systematic review Knowledge synthesis Realist review Meta-ethnography Meta-narrative Meta-synthesis

发布时间 2018-04-18

翻译满意度评价：

准确一般字义偏差语意偏离译文作用小提交

浏览2

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

2016年73卷

19-28页

相似文献

中文期刊
外文期刊
学位论文
会议论文

检索历史清除

A scoping review identifies multiple emerging knowledge synthesis methods, but few studies operationalize the method

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

相似文献

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

相关期刊

参考文献：
指定格式：	NoteExpress EndNote RefWorks NoteFirst

检索历史 清除

A scoping review identifies multiple emerging knowledge synthesis methods, but few studies operationalize the method

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

相似文献

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

相关期刊

检索历史清除