首页> Biochemistry and molecular biology education> Is the Undergraduate Research Experience (URE) Always Best? THE POWER OF CHOICE IN A BIFURCATED PRACTICAL STREAM FOR A LARGE INTRODUCTORY BIOCHEMISTRY CLASS

Is the Undergraduate Research Experience (URE) Always Best? THE POWER OF CHOICE IN A BIFURCATED PRACTICAL STREAM FOR A LARGE INTRODUCTORY BIOCHEMISTRY CLASS

导出原文传递

翻译打印收藏纠错

第一作者： Susan L. Rowland

作者： Susan L. Rowland ^[1] ; Gwen A. Lawrie ; James B. Y. H. Behrendorff

作者单位： School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia ^[1]

关键词 Active learning assessment of educational activities curriculum design development and implementation laboratory exercises learning and curriculum design new course development.

发布时间 2013-11-20

翻译满意度评价：

准确一般字义偏差语意偏离译文作用小提交

浏览0

Biochemistry and molecular biology education

2012年40卷1期

46-62页

相似文献

中文期刊
外文期刊
学位论文
会议论文

浏览0

Biochemistry and molecular biology education

2012年40卷1期

46-62页

检索历史清除

Is the Undergraduate Research Experience (URE) Always Best? THE POWER OF CHOICE IN A BIFURCATED PRACTICAL STREAM FOR A LARGE INTRODUCTORY BIOCHEMISTRY CLASS

Biochemistry and molecular biology education

相似文献

同项目论文

Biochemistry and molecular biology education

相关期刊

参考文献：
指定格式：	NoteExpress EndNote RefWorks NoteFirst

检索历史 清除

Is the Undergraduate Research Experience (URE) Always Best? THE POWER OF CHOICE IN A BIFURCATED PRACTICAL STREAM FOR A LARGE INTRODUCTORY BIOCHEMISTRY CLASS

Biochemistry and molecular biology education

相似文献

同项目论文

Biochemistry and molecular biology education

相关期刊

检索历史清除