首页> Early human development> A comparison of the general movements assessment with traditional approaches to newborn and infant assessment: concurrent validity.

A comparison of the general movements assessment with traditional approaches to newborn and infant assessment: concurrent validity.

导出原文传递

翻译打印收藏纠错

第一作者： Snider LM

作者： Snider LM ^[1] ; Majnemer A ; Mazer B ; Campbell S ; Bos AF

作者单位： School of Physical & Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. laurie.snider@mcgill.ca ^[1]

关键词 Infant Knowledge acquisition using a method of assessment week Age NOS 婴儿

发布时间 2013-11-20

翻译满意度评价：

准确一般字义偏差语意偏离译文作用小提交

浏览0

Early human development

2008年84卷5期

297-303页

相似文献

中文期刊
外文期刊
学位论文
会议论文

浏览0

点击下载本期目录封面

Early human development

2008年84卷5期

297-303页

检索历史清除

A comparison of the general movements assessment with traditional approaches to newborn and infant assessment: concurrent validity.

Early human development

相似文献

同项目论文

Early human development

相关期刊

参考文献：
指定格式：	NoteExpress EndNote RefWorks NoteFirst

检索历史 清除

A comparison of the general movements assessment with traditional approaches to newborn and infant assessment: concurrent validity.

Early human development

相似文献

同项目论文

Early human development

相关期刊

检索历史清除