相同剂量长春瑞滨序贯或联合卡培他滨一线治疗转移性乳腺癌的Ⅱ期随机对照临床试验
Sequential versus simultaneous use of vinorelbine and capecitabine at the same dosage as first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer
摘要Objective: It remains unclear whether simultaneous use of two chemotherapeutic drugs is better than sequential use. This trial was designed to explore efficacy and safety of sequential vs simultaneous use of vinorelbine and capecitabine at the same dosage as first-line therapy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: This was a un-icenter, randomized phase Ⅱ trial. Patients randomized into the simultaneous group (group A) were simultaneously administered with vinorelbine and capecitabine while those in the sequential group (group B) received vinorelbine followed by capecitabine at the same dosage. Results: Sixty-six patients were screened and 30 patients were randomized into either group. There're significant differences in the clinical benefit rate (CBR) with 80.0% for group A vs 53.3% for group B (P = 0.028). With a median follow up time of 13.5 months, there were no significant differences between the two groups in PFS (median PFS: 7.70 months for group A vs 7.23 months for group B, P = 0.436). Grade Ⅲ or Ⅳ neutropenia (83.3% vs 50.0%, P = 0.006), all grades of fatigue (56.7% vs 30.0%, P = 0.037) and anorexia (53.3% vs 23.3%, P = 0.017) were significantly more frequent in simultaneous group. Conclusion: Simultaneous administration of vinorelbine and capecitabine can bring about improvements in CBR, but cannot translate into long-term benefits, such as progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). These findings,combined with a relatively better tolerability in sequential group, showed that both simultaneous and sequential administrations are reasonable options for MBC patients.
更多相关知识
- 浏览219
- 被引1
- 下载16

相似文献
- 中文期刊
- 外文期刊
- 学位论文
- 会议论文