Comparative evaluation of single-artery cannulation with passive venous drainage versus traditional dual-cannula ex vivo lung perfusion in a rat model
摘要Background:Ex vivo lung perfusion(EVLP)has emerged as a critical technique for lung preservation and evaluation prior to transplantation.While conventional rat EVLP systems utilize closed-loop dual cannulation of pulmonary artery(PA)and vein,the effect of the simplified model using single PA cannulation with passive venous drainage is unknown.Methods:We developed two EVLP models in rats:a semi-closed circuit with PA-only cannulation and left atrial incision for passive venous drainage(SC-EVLP),and a closed circuit employing both arterial and venous cannulation(C-EVLP).Donor lungs were perfused for a defined duration and subsequently orthotopically transplanted.We evaluated pulmonary function parameters,histopathological injury scores,inflammatory cytokine levels,and apoptotic marker expression at the end of perfusion and posttransplantation.Results:Compared to the conventional EVLP,the SC-EVLP group exhibited significantly lower PA pressure and improved dynamic lung compliance throughout perfusion.Although the levels of tumor necrosis factor-α in the perfusate were higher in the SC-EVLP group,other cytokine levels in the perfusate and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid exhibited no significant differences.Pulmonary edema was reduced in the SC-EVLP group,as indicated by a lower lung wet-to-dry ratio.After transplantation,lungs from the SC-EVLP group exhibited lower histological injury scores,reduced apoptosis,and decreased serum cytokine levels,suggesting attenuated inflammation and tissue damage.Conclusions:In a rat model,single PA cannulation with passive venous drainage reduced pulmonary edema during EVLP and reduced lung injury and systemic inflammation after transplantation.
更多相关知识
- 浏览1
- 被引0
- 下载0

相似文献
- 中文期刊
- 外文期刊
- 学位论文
- 会议论文


换一批



