医学文献 >>
  • 检索发现
  • 增强检索
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
默认
×
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

Abductive statistical methods improve the results of calibration curve bioassays:An example of determining zinc bioavailability in broiler chickens

摘要In this paper,we discuss the theory behind calibration curve experiments and their application to a zinc(Zn)bioavailability study with broiler chickens.Seven replicates of 16 male commercial broiler chicks were fed starter diets for 14 days.Six diets had different levels of a potential Zn source and one was a positive control with standard industry levels of Zn for comparison.Four commonly used methods of calculating bioavailability means and confidence intervals(CI)from a calibration curve(standard curve)experiment to estimate the bioavailability of a new zinc source in broiler chickens were compared.The methods compared were the following:1)the Counter-Intuitive Method uses a multiple-range test to compare unknown test and standard samples;2)the Intuitive Method uses standard linear regression and inverts the equation to predict Zn bioavailability for each replicate of test samples;3)the Abductive Method uses Graybill's Equation,based on theory and observation,to estimate CI's;and 4)the Sophistic Method uses reverse regression,and calculates Zn bioavailability values directly from the equation.The Counter-Intuitive Method only gives information about which standards the test samples are,or are not,significantly different from respectively(average available Zn not predicted).The Intuitive Method ig-nores error about the standard curve and theoretically cannot estimate the CI directly(X±SEM=107.5±15.8 mg Zn/kg).The Sophistic Method underestimates and overestimates the test sample mean values above and below the mean of the standards,respectively(X=96.6 mg Zn/kg).The Abductive Method has an advantage over the other methods:The mean prediction estimation is consistent with theory(107.5±6.1 mg Zn/kg;X±SEM).When test or"unknown"samples are near the mean of the standard samples,the CI is smaller than when near the extremes of the calibration curve.When calibration curve error is small(R2>approximately 0.95),there is little advantage to using the Abductive Method,but when calibration curve error is larger,as in many bioassays with growing ani-mals,the Abductive Method improves the accuracy of the CI calculations.The Abductive Method was used to demonstrate the influence of the number of replicate samples on experimental power and cost.

更多
广告
作者 Gene M.Pesti [1] Lynne Billard [2] Shu-Biao Wu [3] Robert A.Swick [3] Thi Thanh Hoai Nguyen [3] Natalie Morgan [3] 学术成果认领
作者单位 The University of New England,Armidale,NSW,2351,Australia;The University of Georgia,Athens,GA,30602,USA [1] The University of Georgia,Athens,GA,30602,USA [2] The University of New England,Armidale,NSW,2351,Australia [3]
发布时间 2022-10-27(万方平台首次上网日期,不代表论文的发表时间)
提交
  • 浏览6
  • 下载0
动物营养(英文版)

动物营养(英文版)

2022年10卷3期

294-304页

SCIMEDLINEISTICCSCD

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

法律状态公告日 法律状态 法律状态信息

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new医文AI 翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷