• 医学文献
  • 知识库
  • 评价分析
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

医学文献>>
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批

Comparison of different treatment planning approaches using VMAT for head and neck cancer patients with metallic dental fillings

摘要Objective:To explore treatment planning approaches using volumetric modulated arc therapy(VMAT)for head and neck cancer patients with metallic dental fillings.Methods:Fifty-six patients with metallic dental fillings treated with radiotherapy were selected,and three VMAT plans,the jaw-tracking plan,fixed-jaw plan,and non-coplanar plan,were designed for each patient.In the jaw-tracking plan,two coplanar partial arc fields that avoid the metal area were set,and the jaw was automatically tracked.In the fixed-jaw plan,different fields were set in three sections according to the fixed-jaw method.The fields were the same as those in the jaw-tracking plan for the section containing metal implants,while full arc fields were set in the nonmetal sections.In the non-coplanar plan,a non-coplanar arc field was added based on the jaw-tracking plan.The treatment plan in the jaw-tracking plan was optimized,and the constraints on the planning target volume(PTV)or organs at risk(OARs)in the jaw-tracking plan were copied to the other two plans.The dose distribution in PTV and OARs of the patients in the three treatment plans was compared.Results:There were no significant differences in the maximum doses to the spinal cord or optic nerves among the three treatment plans.However,compared with the jaw-tracking plan,the fixed-jaw plan showed lower mean doses to the pharynx[(42.9±7.1)Gy vs.(44.1±7.1)Gy,P<0.05]and larynx[(43.9±3.9)Gy vs.(45.4±4.7)Gy,P<0.05],while the non-coplanar plan obtained significantly better dose distribution in PTV and all OARs except for the spinal cord and optic nerves.Meanwhile,the non-coplanar plan performed significantly better than the fixed-jaw plan in terms of the maximum doses to the brainstem[(50.2±4.0)Gy vs.(51.4±4.6)Gy,P<0.05],left lens[(5.8±0.2)Gy vs.(6.3±0.4 Gy),P<0.05],and right lens[(5.9±0.3)Gy vs.(6.2±0.3)Gy,P<0.05].Conclusions:The non-coplanar VMAT is an optimal method for treating head and neck cancer patients with metallic dental fillings since it can provide better dose distribution in PTV and reduce doses to OARs.

更多
广告
作者 Liugang Gao [1] Chunying Li [1] Zhengda Lu [2] Kai Xie [1] Tao Lin [1] Jianfeng Sui [1] Xinye Ni [1] 学术成果认领
作者单位 Department of Radiotherapy,Second People's Hospital of Changzhou,Center for Medical Physics,Nanjing Medical University,Changzhou,213003,China [1] Department of Radiotherapy,Second People's Hospital of Changzhou,Center for Medical Physics,Nanjing Medical University,Changzhou,213003,China;School of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics,Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing,213000,China [2]
栏目名称 Technical reports
DOI 10.1016/j.radmp.2021.05.002
发布时间 2024-06-14
提交
  • 浏览4
  • 下载0
放射医学与防护(英文)

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷