优质综合护理干预在超声介入手术中的应用效果
Application of high-quality comprehensive nursing intervention in ultrasound interventional surgery
摘要目的:观察评价分析优质综合护理干预在超声介入手术(UIS)中的应用效果。方法:选择2018年2月至2019年12月期间本院收治的超声介入手术治疗患者106例,将所有患者随机对照试验(RCT)分为两组,各53例。对照组给予常规护理干预;观察组在对照组基础上给予优质综合护理干预;比较两组护理干预后的临床效果。结果:观察组手术配合度、护理满意度分别为98.11%(52/53)、100.00%(53/53),均明显高于对照组81.13%(43/53)、84.91%(45/53),差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05);干预前,两组患者SAS、SDS评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(均 P>0.05);干预后,观察组SAS、SDS评分分别为(31.07±2.42)分、(32.83±3.14)分,显著低于对照组(40.64±2.59)分、(45.09±4.23)分,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05)。 结论:超声介入手术中给予优质综合护理干预,能够显著提升患者手术配合度及对护理的满意度,有效改善患者心理健康质量。
更多相关知识
abstractsObjective:To observe, evaluate, and analyze the effect applying high-quality comprehensive nursing intervention in ultrasound interventional surgery (UIS).Methods:A total of 106 patients who underwent ultrasound interventional surgery in our hospital from February, 2018 to December, 2019 were selected and randomly divided into a control group and an observation group, with 53 cases in each group. Both groups took routine nursing intervention; in addition, the observation group too high-quality comprehensive nursing interventions. The clinical effects of the two groups were compared.Results:The surgical cooperation degree and the nursing satisfaction were significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group [98.11% (52/53) vs. 81.13% (43/53) vs. 100.00% (53/53) vs. 84.91% (45/53); both P<0.05]. After the interventions, the scores of SAS and SDS were lower in the observation group than in the control group [(31.07±2.42) vs. (40.64±2.59) and (32.83±3.14) vs. (45.09±4.23); both P<0.05]. Conclusion:Providing high-quality comprehensive nursing intervention during ultrasound interventional surgery can significantly improve the patients' surgical coordination and satisfaction with nursing, and effectively improve their mental health.
More相关知识
- 浏览60
- 被引6
- 下载16

相似文献
- 中文期刊
- 外文期刊
- 学位论文
- 会议论文