NBNA评分用于足月小样儿的神经发育评价
NBNA used to assess the neurodevelopment of full-term small for gestational age infants
摘要目的 了解足月小样儿神经行为特点,比较不同类型足月小样儿神经行为的差异,并探讨其原因.方法 对本院新生儿病房2008年至2012年收治的148例足月小样儿在生后第7天、14天、28天进行新生儿行为神经测定(NBNA)评分,并比较匀称型、非匀称型及混合型足月小样儿的NBNA评分情况.结果足月小样儿NBNA评分低于正常足月新生儿,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).三种类型的足月小样儿NBNA评分高低排序为非匀称型>匀称型>混合型,组间两两进行比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 足月小样儿的神经活动低于正常新生儿水平,三种类型的足月小样儿神经发育情况为非匀称型高于匀称型高于混合型.
更多相关知识
abstractsObjective To investigate the difference of nerve behavior among the different types of fullterm small for gestational age infants(SGA) infants and the reasons.Methods The neonatal behavioral neurological assessment(NBNA) scores were given for 148 full-term SGA infants aged 7,14 and 28 days born in Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University.The comparason analysis was conducted among three types including symmetic,asymmetric and the mixture of them.Results Significant differences (P < 0.05) were found between the NBNA scores for full-term SGA infants and normal infants.The NABA scores of full-term SGA infants were lower than those of normal infants.The NBNA scores for three types of full-term SGA infants followed the order of asymmetric > symmetric > mixture of them,significant difference was found between any two types of three types(P < 0.05).Conclusion Full-term SGA infants show the poorer quality of nerve behavior compared with the nomal infants.The neurodevelopment levels for three types of full-term SGA infants are asymmetric,symmetric,mixture of them in the order.
More相关知识
- 浏览646
- 被引7
- 下载228

相似文献
- 中文期刊
- 外文期刊
- 学位论文
- 会议论文