• 医学文献
  • 知识库
  • 评价分析
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

医学文献>>
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批

Optimal use of red cell volume distribution width-to-platelet ratio to exclude cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B

摘要Background and aims:Hepatitis B virus(HBV)infection is a major public health issue worldwide as it may cause serious liver diseases such as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).Ruling out cirrhosis is important when treating chronic hepatitis B(CHB).The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index(APRI),fibrosis score based on four factors(FIB-4),and red cell volume distribution width-to-platelet ratio(RPR)in diagnosing liver fibrosis stages and to identify new cut-off values to rule out cirrhosis.Methods:Between 2005 and 2020,2182 eligible individuals who underwent liver biopsy were randomly assigned to derivation and validation cohorts in a 6:4 ratio.A grid search was applied to identify optimal cut-off values with a sensitivity of>90%and a negative predictive value(NPV)of at least 95%.Results:Overall,1309 individuals(175 patients with cirrhosis)were included in the derivation dataset,and 873(117 patients with cirrhosis)were included in the validation cohort.The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of RPR for diagnosing cirrhosis was 0.821,which was comparable to that of APRI(0.818,P=0.7905)and FIB-4(0.803,P=0.2395).When applying an RPR of 0.06,cirrhosis was correctly identified with a sensitivity of 93.1%and an NPV of 97.1%,while it misclassified 12 of 175(6.9%)patients in the derivation cohort.In the validation cohort,RPR had a sensitivity and NPV of 97.4%and 99.0%,respectively,and only misclassified 3 of 117(2.6%)patients.Subgroup analysis indicated that the new RPR cut-off value performed more consistently than that of APRI and FIB-4 in all subgroups.Conclusion:A recently established cut-off value for RPR(≤0.06)was validated and was more effective than APRI and FIB-4 in excluding patients with cirrhosis due to a higher sensitivity and NPV and a lower misclassification rate.This simple and dependable test could have significant clinical implications in identifying patients who require monitoring for portal hypertension-associated complications and screening for HCC,particularly in middle and primary healthcare settings.

更多
广告
作者 Hongsheng Yu [1] Chao Li [2] Mingkai Li [1] Zixi Liang [1] Abdukyamu Smayi [1] Bilan Yang [1] Kodjo-Kunale Abassa [1] Jianning Chen [3] Bin Wu [1] Yidong Yang [1] 学术成果认领
作者单位 Department of Gastroenterology,The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou,Guangdong,China;Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research,Guangzhou,Guangdong,China [1] Department of Radiology,The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou,Guangdong,China [2] Department of Pathology,The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou,Guangdong,China [3]
栏目名称
DOI 10.1016/j.livres.2023.08.006
发布时间 2023-12-21
  • 浏览2
  • 下载1
肝脏研究(英文)

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷