• 医学文献
  • 知识库
  • 评价分析
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

医学文献>>
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批

The impacts of different embolization techniques on splenic artery embolization for blunt splenic injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

摘要Background:Splenic artery embolization (SAE) has been an effective adjunct to the Non-operative management (NOM) for blunt splenic injury (BSI).However,the optimal embolization techniques are still inconclusive.To further understand the roles of different embolization locations and embolic materials in SAE,we conducted this system review and meta-analyses.Methods:Clinical studies related to SAE for adult patients were researched in electronic databases,included PubMed,Embase,ScienceDirect and Google Scholar Search (between October 1991 and March 2013),and relevant information was extracted.To eliminate the heterogeneity,a sensitivity analysis was conducted on two reduced study sets.Then,the pooled outcomes were compared and the quality assessments were performed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).The SAE success rate,incidences of life-threatening complications of different embolization techniques were compared by x2 test in 1st study set.Associations between different embolization techniques and clinical outcomes were evaluated by fixed-effects model in 2nd study set.Results:Twenty-three studies were included in 1st study set.And then,13 of them were excluded,because lack of the necessary details of SAE.The remaining 10 studies comprised 2nd study set,and quality assessments were performed using NOS.In 1st set,the primary success rate is 90.1% and the incidence of life-threatening complications is 20.4%,though the cases which required surgical intervention are very few (6.4%).For different embolization locations,there was no obvious association between primary success rate and embolization location in both 1st and 2nd study sets (P>0.05).But in 2nd study set,it indicated that proximal embolization reduced severe complications and complications needed surgical management.As for the embolic materials,the success rate between coil and gelfoam is not significant.However,coil is associated with a lower risk of life-threatening complications,as well as less complications requiring surgical management.Conclusion:Different embolization techniques affect the clinical outcomes of SAE.The proximal embolization is the best option due to the less life-threatening complications.For commonly embolic material,coil is superior to gelfoam for fewer severe complications and less further surgery management.

更多
广告
作者单位 Department of Cardiology,General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region,Shenyang 110016,China [1] Department of Cardiology,Xinqiao Hospital of Third Military Medical University,Chongqing 400038,China [2]
栏目名称 RESEARCH
发布时间 2018-09-30
基金项目
grant from the Innovation Project of Military Medicine
提交
  • 浏览13
  • 下载0
军事医学研究(英文)

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷