摘要目的 评价中文版护士术后疼痛管理循证实践先决条件问卷(Carlson's Prior Conditions Instruments,CPCI)的信效度.方法 以便利抽样的方法选取临床200名外科护士,用中文版CPCI进行现场调查,并进行信、效度分析.结果 修订的中文版CPCI由6个因子组成,累计贡献率为61.089％,因素负荷为0.541～0.902;各分量表与问卷总分的相关系数在0.583～0.825;总问卷内部一致性系数为0.865、分半信度为0.661、重测信度为0.904,各维度的Cronbach's α系数为0.772～0.860、分半信度0.678～0.830、重测信度为0.822～0.946.结论 修订的中文版CPCI具有较好的信度和效度,可用于探索促进或阻碍外科护士采取术后疼痛管理循证实践先决条件的测量工具.

abstractsObjective To evaluate the reliability and validity of Chinese version of the Carlson's Prior Conditions Instruments(CPCI)for post-operative pain management practices of nurses.Methods With convenience sampling,a total of 200 surgical nurses were investigated with Chinese version Dimensions of Carlson's Prior Conditions Instruments (CPCI),and the reliability and validity were tested.Results Six factors were extracted by factor analysis and could explain 61.089％ of the total variance with the Chinese version of CPCI.The correlation between each sub-scale and total scale were ranged from 0.583～0.825.The Cronbach's α、split-half coefficient and test-retest reliability of PICI were 0.865、0.661、0.904 respectively.The Cronbach's α、split-half coefficient and test-retest reliability of each sub-scale were ranged from 0.772～0.860、0.678～0.830、0.822～0.946 respectively.Conclusions The revised Chinese CPCI is reliable and valid,and can be used in the research of prior conditions which may influence surgical nurses to take evidence-based pain management practices.