中文版类风湿关节炎自我效能感量表的信效度研究
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Rheumatoid Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale
摘要目的 翻译类风湿关节炎自我效能感量表(RASE),评价中文版RASE信效度.方法采用便利抽样法选取类风湿关节炎患者188例作为研究对象.按照量表翻译模式,对英文版RASE进行汉化、文化调适,检验中文版RASE信效度.结果项目分析显示中文版RASE可鉴别高分组与低分组,Pearson相关性分析显示,各条目得分与总分均呈正相关(P<0.01).探索性因子分析共提取8个公因子,累积方差贡献率为68.55%.中文版RASE的Cronbachα系数为0.901,各维度Cronbachα系数为0.660~0.867;1周后重测信度为0.955,各维度重测信度为0.819~0.984;分半信度为0.848.结论中文版RASE具有良好的信效度,可应用于我国类风湿关节炎患者自我效能感相关研究中.
更多相关知识
abstractsObjective To translate Rheumatoid Arthritis Self-efficacy Scale (RASE) into Chinese and to evaluate its reliability and validity. Methods A total of 188 hospitalized patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were selected as research subjects through convenience sampling method. According to the translation mode of the scale, Chinesization and cultural adjustment were conducted to the English version of RASEto test reliability and validity. Results Item analysis showed that the Chinese version of RASE could discriminate the high-score group from the low-score group (P<0.01). Pearson correlation analysis showed that the correlation coefficient between the score of each item and the total score of the Chinese version of RASE was positively correlated (P<0.01).Exploratory factor analysis extracted a total of 8 common factors, which explained 68.55%of the total variance. The Cronbachαof the Chinese version of RASE was 0.901, and Cronbachαof each dimension ranged from 0.660 to 0.867;the retest reliability was 0.955 after 1 week, and ranged from 0.819 to 0.984 for each dimension;the split-half reliability coefficient was 0.848. Conclusion The Chinese version of RASE has good reliability and validity, which can be applied to the research of self-efficacy of patients with RA in China.
More相关知识
- 浏览530
- 被引14
- 下载269

相似文献
- 中文期刊
- 外文期刊
- 学位论文
- 会议论文


换一批



