摘要目的 探讨不同肠道准备方法 对应用结扎速血管闭合系统行痔切除术的效果以及对患者的影响.方法 痔疮患者共78例按手术日分为硫酸镁组(n=21),开塞露组(n=32)和尤肠道准备的对照组(n=25)进行术前肠道准备.比较3组方法 的效果,包括手术医牛对肠道准备的满意度,患者对肠道准备的舒适度,术后伤口最疼痛的持续时间及VAS疼痛评分,初次排便时间及排便时VAS疼痛评分,术后恢复正常牛活时间及伤口愈合时间.结果 3组患者的观察指标中只有患者对肠道准备的舒适度比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01),其中硫酸镁组61.90%的患者有不适但不影响生活;开塞露组各有6.25%的患者有不适但不影响生活,或影响生活;差异均高于对照组.结论 3种肠道准备方法 在应用结扎速血管闭合系统行痔切除术的疗效相近,在患者舒适度方面,不做肠道准备直接手术是最佳选择.如果需做肠道准备,则使用开塞露优于口服硫酸镁.

abstractsObjective To approach the effect of Hemorthoidectomy using LigaSure vessel sealantsystem with different bowel preparation means.Methods Seventy-eight patients with hemorrhoids were divided into three groups which are the Epsom salt group(21 cases),the Kaiselu group(32 eases),and the no bowel preparation group(25 cases)according to their operation's day.The observation items are the satisfaction rate of the operative doctors,the degree of comfort to patient,the severe pain duration time and scores,the first defecation time and the pain scores after operation,and the intention time．Results 61.90％patients in Epsom salt group felt uncomfortable but did not influence the life.6.25％patients in Kaiselu group felt uncomfortablebut did not influence the life and 6.25％patients felt uncomfortable and influence the life.The degree of comfort of patient Was significant difference in three groups(H=13.39,P=0.001 2).There were no significant differences in other observation items among three groups(P>0.05).Condusions There are similar effect in three groups with Hemorrhoidectomy patient using LigaSure vessel sealant system,but in the degree of comfort to patients,the no bowel preparation means is the hest choice for patient.If the doctor order to do bowel preparation for patient,the bowel preparation using Kaiselu is better than that using Epsom salt.